1. Split
- Posted by kbochert at copper.net
Jun 04, 2003
I'm benchmarking Bach 2.0. Can anyone point me to a good
Euphoria version of split?
i.e.
split ("a split test", "\n \t")
returns: {"a", "split", "test"}
Thanx
Karl Bochert
2. Re: Split
On Tue, 03 Jun 2003 21:27:43 -0700, <kbochert at copper.net> wrote:
>
>
> I'm benchmarking Bach 2.0. Can anyone point me to a good Euphoria
> version of split?
> i.e.
> split ("a split test", "\n \t") returns: {"a", "split", "test"}
>
How about this one...
function split(sequence s, sequence t)
return {"a", "split", "test"}
end function
--
cheers,
Derek Parnell
3. Re: Split
- Posted by gertie at visionsix.com
Jun 04, 2003
On 3 Jun 2003, at 21:27, kbochert at copper.net wrote:
>
>
> I'm benchmarking Bach 2.0. Can anyone point me to a good
> Euphoria version of split?
> i.e.
> split ("a split test", "\n \t")
> returns: {"a", "split", "test"}
parse() is in strtok
Kat
4. Re: Split
To be serious, perhaps strok by kat would serve your needs ...
function flat(sequence s)
sequence z
for i = 1 to length(s) do
z &= s[i]
end for
return z
end function
function split(sequence s, sequence t)
return deparse(flat(s&t), " \n\t")
end function
eh?
jbrown
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 02:44:39PM +1000, Derek Parnell wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 03 Jun 2003 21:27:43 -0700, <kbochert at copper.net> wrote:
>
> >
> >I'm benchmarking Bach 2.0. Can anyone point me to a good Euphoria
> >version of split?
> >i.e.
> >split ("a split test", "\n \t") returns: {"a", "split", "test"}
> >
>
> How about this one...
>
> function split(sequence s, sequence t)
> return {"a", "split", "test"}
> end function
>
>
> --
>
> cheers,
> Derek Parnell
>
>
>
> TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE!
>
>
--
/"\ ASCII ribbon | http://www.geocities.com/jbrown1050/
\ / campain against | Linux User:190064
X HTML in e-mail and | Linux Machine:84163
/*\ news, and unneeded MIME |
5. Re: Split
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 12:58:07AM -0400, jbrown105 at speedymail.org wrote:
>
>
> To be serious, perhaps strok by kat would serve your needs ...
>
> function flat(sequence s)
> sequence z
> for i = 1 to length(s) do
> z &= s[i]
> end for
> return z
> end function
> function split(sequence s, sequence t)
> return deparse(flat(s&t), " \n\t")
Opps.
That line should be:
return parse(flat(s&t), " \n\t")
> end function
>
> eh?
>
> jbrown
>
> On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 02:44:39PM +1000, Derek Parnell wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 03 Jun 2003 21:27:43 -0700, <kbochert at copper.net> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >I'm benchmarking Bach 2.0. Can anyone point me to a good Euphoria
> > >version of split?
> > >i.e.
> > >split ("a split test", "\n \t") returns: {"a", "split", "test"}
> > >
> >
> > How about this one...
> >
> > function split(sequence s, sequence t)
> > return {"a", "split", "test"}
> > end function
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > cheers,
> > Derek Parnell
> >
> >
> > TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE!
> >
> >
> --
> /"\ ASCII ribbon | http://www.geocities.com/jbrown1050/
> \ / campain against | Linux User:190064
> X HTML in e-mail and | Linux Machine:84163
> /*\ news, and unneeded MIME |
>
>
>
> TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE!
>
>
--
/"\ ASCII ribbon | http://www.geocities.com/jbrown1050/
\ / campain against | Linux User:190064
X HTML in e-mail and | Linux Machine:84163
/*\ news, and unneeded MIME |
6. Re: Split
- Posted by gertie at visionsix.com
Jun 04, 2003
On 4 Jun 2003, at 1:07, jbrown105 at speedymail.org wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 12:58:07AM -0400, jbrown105 at speedymail.org wrote:
> >
> >
> > To be serious, perhaps strok by kat would serve your needs ...
> >
> > function flat(sequence s)
> > sequence z
> > for i = 1 to length(s) do
> > z &= s[i]
> > end for
> > return z
> > end function
> > function split(sequence s, sequence t)
> > return deparse(flat(s&t), " \n\t")
>
> Opps.
>
> That line should be:
>
> return parse(flat(s&t), " \n\t")
I thought Karls example was already flat?
Kat
>
> > end function
> >
> > eh?
> >
> > jbrown
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 02:44:39PM +1000, Derek Parnell wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, 03 Jun 2003 21:27:43 -0700, <kbochert at copper.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > >I'm benchmarking Bach 2.0. Can anyone point me to a good Euphoria
> > > >version of split?
> > > >i.e.
> > > >split ("a split test", "\n \t") returns: {"a", "split", "test"}
> > > >
> > >
> > > How about this one...
> > >
> > > function split(sequence s, sequence t)
> > > return {"a", "split", "test"}
> > > end function
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > cheers,
> > > Derek Parnell
> > >
> > >
> > > TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE!
> > >
> > >
> > --
> > /"\ ASCII ribbon | http://www.geocities.com/jbrown1050/
> > \ / campain against | Linux User:190064
> > X HTML in e-mail and | Linux Machine:84163
> > /*\ news, and unneeded MIME |
> >
> >
> > TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE!
> >
> >
> --
> /"\ ASCII ribbon | http://www.geocities.com/jbrown1050/
> \ / campain against | Linux User:190064
> X HTML in e-mail and | Linux Machine:84163
> /*\ news, and unneeded MIME |
>
>
>
> TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE!
>
>
7. Re: Split
He he he, that looks like how *I* would code it :)))
Dan Moyer
----- Original Message -----
From: "Derek Parnell" <ddparnell at bigpond.com>
To: "EUforum" <EUforum at topica.com>
Subject: Re: Split
>
>
> On Tue, 03 Jun 2003 21:27:43 -0700, <kbochert at copper.net> wrote:
>
> >
> > I'm benchmarking Bach 2.0. Can anyone point me to a good Euphoria
> > version of split?
> > i.e.
> > split ("a split test", "\n \t") returns: {"a", "split", "test"}
> >
>
> How about this one...
>
> function split(sequence s, sequence t)
> return {"a", "split", "test"}
> end function
>
>
> --
>
> cheers,
> Derek Parnell
>
>
>
> TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE!
>
