OpenEuphoria

2. Re: LW for Windows - very good news!

• Posted by Jonas Temple <jtemple at yh?i?net> Dec 31, 2007
• 728 views

Rob/Junko,

I decided to cheat.  I figured out how you displayed the image and just did it
manually.  How was the food?  :)

Jonas Temple
http://www.innovativesys.net

4. Re: LW for Windows - very good news!

• Posted by Robert Craig <rds at RapidEup?oria?com> Dec 31, 2007
• 823 views

Matt Lewis wrote:
> Rob,
> 
> dos_rescue.ew is interesting, however, I think you have a memory leak in
> the call to DrawText, where you call allocate_string() instead of using
> the already allocated pointer stored in 's':
> }}}
<eucode>
> global procedure putsxy(sequence pos, sequence string, 
> 			integer fcolor, integer bcolor)
>     atom s
>     
>     poke4(charRect, pos[1])
>     poke4(charRect+CHAR_TOP, pos[2])
>     poke4(charRect+CHAR_RIGHT, pos[1]+length(string)*8)
>     poke4(charRect+CHAR_BOTTOM, pos[2]+18)
>     s = allocate_string(string)  -- could reserve large space instead
>     c_proc(SetTextColor, {hdc, color_map[1+fcolor]})
>     
>     c_proc(SetBkColor, {hdc, color_map[1+bcolor]})
>     
>     c_proc(SetBkMode, {hdc, OPAQUE})
>     
>     c_proc(DrawText, {hdc, allocate_string(string), -1, charRect,
>     DT_SINGLE_LINE})
>     free(s)
> end procedure
> </eucode>
{{{


Thanks for spotting that.
I must have intended to use s, but forgot.
Here's my new code:

global procedure putsxy(sequence pos, sequence string,
                        integer fcolor, integer bcolor)
    atom s

    poke4(charRect, pos[1])
    poke4(charRect+CHAR_TOP, pos[2])
    poke4(charRect+CHAR_RIGHT, pos[1]+length(string)*8)
    poke4(charRect+CHAR_BOTTOM, pos[2]+18)

    c_proc(SetTextColor, {hdc, color_map[1+fcolor]})
    c_proc(SetBkColor, {hdc, color_map[1+bcolor]})
    c_proc(SetBkMode, {hdc, OPAQUE})

    s = allocate_string(string)
    c_proc(DrawText, {hdc, s, -1, charRect, DT_SINGLE_LINE})
    free(s)
end procedure

I recompiled and uploaded the new version.

I don't think allocating a fixed, large space for the string
will have any significant effect on speed. On my machine,
lw, even when interpreted, only uses about 1% of the available CPU.
It was using almost 100%, until I inserted a 1 ms sleep
inside the only time-share task, task_video_save(), when the program 
finds that it has no video data to write out, and no real-time
tasks ready to run at the moment.

Thanks,
   Rob Craig
   Rapid Deployment Software
   http://www.RapidEuphoria.com