1. Re:Euphoria being OO survet
The idea is not useless. But what if the poll results end up in a
wastebasket?
By the way, it is not the lack of new features that hurts me (and
seemingly quite a bunch of other more talented programmers) in Eu. It is
the lack of useful features. New ill-conceived gadgets could ruin
everything, and RC is probably overreacting in this respect. I'd accept
to wait a couple years more and get somethins more usable and about just
as reliable.
CChris
>
> Of course, polls will have a much greater effect on OpenEuphoria ... the RFC
> itself will be based on a voting mechanism even. Why do we need RDS to agree?
> If people who want to keep using Euphoria but are fed up with lack of new
> features in RDS Euphoria want to be heard, they now have the option of using
> OE instead of accepting the current Euphoria or moving away from it
> altogether.
> (The best part, is that since the official interpreter/compiler/translator
> (not
> sure which quite yet) will probably be written in OE itself ... hence an
> unsatified user has the option of adding a new feature themself if needed.)
>
> Hence, I think the idea of polls are far from useless.
>
> jbrown
