1. Reply to Address
- Posted by chris bensler <bensler at Mailops.Com> Jan 22, 2001
- 478 views
Is it true that everyone has their reply to address set to the listserv? I find this hard to believe, but it seems the only way I can get this blasted thing to do so! Every msg I send has the reply to address set to my email addy. I don't want to change it to the list, because then ALL the email I send, replies will be sent to the list. Chances are.. it has to do with my email client, but I didn't have this problem before, I've been using this same addy for the list for a long time. I'm on a web based client, so I think that has to do with it. Any suggestions? And no, using Outlook is not an option. I'm accessing the net from an E-Cafe. I would rather not get yet another mail server. I have plenty, but like I said, I've been using this one for a long time, and I just noticed recently that my posts are being replied to personally.. Chris ________________________________________________________________
2. Re: Reply to Address
- Posted by Robert Craig <rds at RAPIDEUPHORIA.COM> Jan 22, 2001
- 491 views
Chris Bensler writes, > Every msg I send has the reply to address set to > my email addy. Maybe you should simply delete the Reply-To address in your e-mail client. You don't need a Reply-To. In your case it seems to be the same as your address anyway. Regards, Rob Craig Rapid Deployment Software http://www.RapidEuphoria.com
3. Re: Reply to Address
- Posted by "Thomas Parslow (PatRat)" <patrat at rat-software.com> Jan 22, 2001
- 451 views
> Is it true that everyone has their reply to address set to the listserv? I > find this hard to > believe, but it seems the only way I can get this blasted thing to do so! > Every msg I > send has the reply to address set to my email addy. > > I don't want to change it to the list, because then ALL the email I send, > replies will be > sent to the list. > > Chances are.. it has to do with my email client, but I didn't have this > problem before, > I've been using this same addy for the list for a long time. > I'm on a web based client, so I think that has to do with it. Any suggestions? > And no, using Outlook is not an option. I'm accessing the net from an E-Cafe. > I would rather not get yet another mail server. I have plenty, but like I > said, I've been > using this one for a long time, and I just noticed recently that my posts are > being > replied to personally.. > > Chris Hi, Set the reply-to address to nothing. You shouldn't normally set the reply-to to anything unless you want ppl to reply to a different address then the from address. Thomas Parslow (PatRat) ICQ #:26359483 Rat Software http://www.rat-software.com/ Please leave quoted text in place when replying
4. Re: Reply to Address
- Posted by Dan B Moyer <DANMOYER at PRODIGY.NET> Jan 22, 2001
- 468 views
- Last edited Jan 23, 2001
It seems to me that anyone who replies to a posting which does *not* have the "reply-to" set to the list would end up sending that reply directly to the poster, instead of to the list as would normally (?) be the intention. But *of course*, no one wants that *every* email they send to *everyone* should have the "reply-to" set to the Euphoria list! So, where (& how) is the "reply-to" setting *set*? Dan Moyer ----- Original Message ----- From: "Thomas Parslow (PatRat)" <patrat at RAT-SOFTWARE.COM> To: <EUPHORIA at LISTSERV.MUOHIO.EDU> Sent: Monday, January 22, 2001 10:38 AM Subject: Re: Reply to Address > > Is it true that everyone has their reply to address set to the listserv? I find this hard to > > believe, but it seems the only way I can get this blasted thing to do so! Every msg I > > send has the reply to address set to my email addy. > > > > I don't want to change it to the list, because then ALL the email I send, replies will be > > sent to the list. > > > > Chances are.. it has to do with my email client, but I didn't have this problem before, > > I've been using this same addy for the list for a long time. > > I'm on a web based client, so I think that has to do with it. Any suggestions? > > And no, using Outlook is not an option. I'm accessing the net from an E-Cafe. > > I would rather not get yet another mail server. I have plenty, but like I said, I've been > > using this one for a long time, and I just noticed recently that my posts are being > > replied to personally.. > > > > Chris > > Hi, > Set the reply-to address to nothing. You shouldn't normally set the > reply-to to anything unless you want ppl to reply to a different > address then the from address. > > Thomas Parslow (PatRat) ICQ #:26359483 > Rat Software > http://www.rat-software.com/ > Please leave quoted text in place when replying
5. Re: Reply to Address
- Posted by "Thomas Parslow (PatRat)" <patrat at rat-software.com> Jan 23, 2001
- 458 views
> It seems to me that anyone who replies to a posting which does *not* have > the "reply-to" set to the list would end up sending that reply directly to > the poster, instead of to the list as would normally (?) be the intention. > But *of course*, no one wants that *every* email they send to *everyone* > should have the "reply-to" set to the Euphoria list! > So, where (& how) is the "reply-to" setting *set*? > Dan Moyer If there is no reply-to address then the list will add it's own. If someone receives an e-mail w/o a reply-to address then they're mail client will use the from address instead. Thomas Parslow (PatRat) ICQ #:26359483 Rat Software http://www.rat-software.com/ Please leave quoted text in place when replying