1. Y2K - off topic, but funny
- Posted by Don Groves <groves at ACM.ORG> Feb 19, 1999
- 417 views
- Last edited Feb 20, 1999
Got this from a friend today and thought other Euphorians might get a hoot out of it: >TO: Company President > >FROM: Data Processing Department Manager > >SUBJECT: Y2K Project Report >_________________________________________________ > >Our staff has completed the 18 months of work on time and on budget. >We have gone through every line of code in every program. We have >analyzed all databases and all data files, and modified all data >to reflect the change. > >We are proud to report that we have completed the Y2K date change >mission, and have now implemented all changes to all programs and all >data to reflect your new standards. Our months are now: Januark, >Februark, March, April, Mak, June, Julk, August, September, October, >November, and December. And our days are: Sundak, Mondak, Tuesdak, >Wednesdak, Thursdak, Fridak, and Saturdak. > >We trust that this is satisfactory, because to be honest, none of >this Y2K problem has made any sense to us. What does the year 2000 >have to do with changing Y to K? But we understand it is a global >problem, and our team is glad to help in any way possible. > >Speaking of which, what do you think we ought to do next year when >the two digit year rolls over from 99 to 00? >We await your direction.
2. Re: Y2K - off topic, but funny
- Posted by Daniel Berstein <daber at PAIR.COM> Feb 20, 1999
- 449 views
At 11:28 PM 19-02-1999 , you wrote: >Got this from a friend today and thought other Euphorians >might get a hoot out of it: Bravo!!! I laught a lot!!! Regards, Daniel Berstein daber at pair.com