1. Re: What's Holding Euphoria Back
- Posted by "Boehme, Gabriel" <gboehme at MUSICLAND.COM> Feb 04, 1999
- 413 views
- Last edited Feb 05, 1999
Ralf Nieuwenhuijsen <nieuwen at XS4ALL.NL> wrote: >>I think we should be allowed to >>redefine *any* routine, not just the built-in ones -- the interpreter can >>generate warning messages for this, very much like the existing warnings for >>the redefinition of built-ins. > >Well, not within the same include file, unless their scope differs. Example: >declaring the same procedure global twice in the same include file should >not be allowed. But when one is local it should be allowed. Overwriting >routines globally declared in other include files should off course *always* >be allowed. Oops! That's what I meant to say. You're right, of course, we wouldn't want to have a global redefining a global. Thanks for catching that one. :) Gabriel Boehme