1. Translator question
- Posted by Brian Broker <bkb at cnw.com> Apr 28, 2004
- 376 views
Which translator package for windows would work best with the MinGW compiler? Thanks, -- Brian
2. Re: Translator question
- Posted by Robert Craig <rds at RapidEuphoria.com> Apr 28, 2004
- 372 views
Brian Broker wrote: > Which translator package for windows would work best with the MinGW > compiler? For Windows, the Euphoria to C Translator supports Watcom, Borland and Lcc. Lcc is not recommended since it has bugs that can affect some translated programs. None of these three are GNU-based, like MinGW. I suspect you'd have trouble getting MinGW to compile the C files produced by the Translator, and work with the Translator run-time library. -- Rob Craig RDS
3. Re: Translator question
- Posted by Marc Giao <giao at sympatico.ca> Apr 29, 2004
- 365 views
Robert Craig wrote: > > > Brian Broker wrote: > > Which translator package for windows would work best with the MinGW > > compiler? > > For Windows, the Euphoria to C Translator supports > Watcom, Borland and Lcc. Lcc is not recommended since > it has bugs that can affect some translated programs. > None of these three are GNU-based, like MinGW. > I suspect you'd have trouble getting MinGW to > compile the C files produced by the Translator, > and work with the Translator run-time library. > > -- Rob Craig > RDS > Good day all, Has anybody tried Pelles C? I heard it's more sodid than Lcc and free for commercial application. http://www.smorgasbordet.com/pellesc/ Does it even work with the Euphoria Translator? Regards, Marc