1. Fw: About The Lcc Compiler's Strike
- Posted by "=?KOI8-R?Q?=EB=C1=DE=C1=CE_=E9.=EE.?=" <kinz at PETERLINK.RU> Jan 12, 2001
- 396 views
- Last edited Jan 13, 2001
---------- > =EF=D4: =EB=C1=DE=C1=CE =E9.=EE. <kinz at peterlink.ru> > =EB=CF=CD=D5: Robert Craig <rds at RapidEuphoria.com> > =F4=C5=CD=C1: Re: About The Lcc Compiler's Strike > =E4=C1=D4=C1: =D0=D1=D4=CE=C9=C3=C1, =F1=CE=D7=C1=D2=D8 12, 2001 15:57 > > Hi Rob, > > > The errors that you got sound like internal > > compiler errors (bugs) in Lcc. > > After searching through of 1.5M documentation > by Jacob Navia, rewrited into the plain .txt > format from 4.5M WW 97 .doc one, > in lcc-win32.txt, in one deep place, > I have found that Lcc does NOT work on > my favourite 386 machines just > due to some like 'xadd' instructions! > > What is this 'xadd', when just silicon > works on 1000 MHz very well now ?!?! > > But Win95 run ok on 386! > > And IDE Lcc run ok on 386! > > But in manual.txt and tutorial.txt, > there is no any warnings about this > principal *restriction* of > the Lcc compiler! > > C compiler wants 1000 MHz silicon, > but what about the better code > of the *programming system* ? > > My simplest but very useful txt-teg.ex > program that works well as .ex and as .exw > and as compiled DOS32 .exe > on ANY 25 - 10000 MHz 32 bit Intel machine ... > and this 15M Lcc package's xadd fiasco ... > he-he-he ... > > Rob, your Eu interpreter is the > !!! excellentest-est-est !!! > programming system not only for > E-U but for ALL users > with ANY 32 bit machine > and with ANY OS from MSDOS 3.30 to ... ! > > Rob, can you post this my message to the > list, because of I am not in the list? > > Regards, > Igor Kachan > kinz at peterlink.ru > > >
2. Fw: About The Lcc Compiler's Strike
- Posted by "=?KOI8-R?Q?=EB=C1=DE=C1=CE_=E9.=EE.?=" <kinz at PETERLINK.RU> Jan 12, 2001
- 393 views
- Last edited Jan 13, 2001
---------- > =EF=D4: Robert Craig <rds at RapidEuphoria.com> > =EB=CF=CD=D5: =EB=C1=DE=C1=CE =E9.=EE. <kinz at peterlink.ru> > =F4=C5=CD=C1: Re: About The Lcc Compiler's Strike > =E4=C1=D4=C1: =D0=D1=D4=CE=C9=C3=C1, =F1=CE=D7=C1=D2=D8 12, 2001 19:53 > > Hi Igor, > > I read somewhere in the Lcc documentation that > a 486 is required. > > XADD "Exchange and Add" only exists on 486 and higher CPU's. > > > Rob, can you post this my message to the > > list, because of I am not in the list? > > I found that anyone can post to the list by > sending a message to: > EUPHORIA at LISTSERV.MUOHIO.EDU > > You don't have to subscribe. > You will be able to see your message and > any responses by clicking "most recent messages" > on our main page. > > Regards, > Rob Craig > Rapid Deployment Software > http://www.RapidEuphoria.com > >
3. Re: Fw: About The Lcc Compiler's Strike
- Posted by Igor Kachan <kinz at PETERLINK.RU> Jan 12, 2001
- 390 views
- Last edited Jan 13, 2001
Dear Eu users: Sorry, this machine is not Russian one ... Regards, Igor Kachan kinz at peterlink.ru http://www.private.peterlink.ru/kinz