1. An apology to Derek
- Posted by don cole <doncole at pacbell.net> Apr 04, 2007
- 527 views
Hello again Derek, What happened, as sometimes does, your post snuck in there while I was writing my post. I did not read your post or even know that you had posted at the time my post was posted. Sorry for the screw up. I think we should come up with a name for this kind of situation, a Round Robin or something, any ideas? Don Cole
2. Re: An apology to Derek
- Posted by ChrisBurch2 <crylex at freeuk.co.uk> Apr 04, 2007
- 506 views
don cole wrote: > > Hello again Derek, > > What happened, as sometimes does, your post snuck in there while I was > writing > my post. I did not read your post or even know that you had posted at the time > my post was posted. Sorry for the screw up. I think we should come up with a > name for this kind of situation, a Round Robin or something, any ideas? > > Don Cole Or how about another yet another reason for a forum format ( ) Chris
3. Re: An apology to Derek
- Posted by Jason Gade <jaygade at yahoo.com> Apr 04, 2007
- 520 views
ChrisBurch2 wrote: > > don cole wrote: > > > > Hello again Derek, > > > > What happened, as sometimes does, your post snuck in there while I was > > writing > > my post. I did not read your post or even know that you had posted at the > > time > > my post was posted. Sorry for the screw up. I think we should come up with a > > name for this kind of situation, a Round Robin or something, any ideas? > > > > Don Cole > > > Or how about another yet another reason for a forum format ( ) > > Chris Well the same thing happens in forums, too, within a thread. On one forum I'm on it's called "simu" or "simu-ninja" for "simultaneous posting". As in "Derek simued Don and everyone got confused." or "Derek went all simu-ninja on Don." Or most likely, Don would curse the simu-ninjas that enabled he and Derek to post at the same time. -- "Any programming problem can be solved by adding a level of indirection." --anonymous "Any performance problem can be solved by removing a level of indirection." --M. Haertel "Premature optimization is the root of all evil in programming." --C.A.R. Hoare j.
4. Re: An apology to Derek
- Posted by Bernie Ryan <xotron at bluefrog.com> Apr 04, 2007
- 508 views
Les Rogers is changing the Subject Line each time he replys to a post which breaks and changes the threads to the next post. That defeats the purpose of trying to follow a thread on a post and messes up the archive threads. Bernie My files in archive: WMOTOR, XMOTOR, W32ENGIN, MIXEDLIB, EU_ENGIN, WIN32ERU, WIN32API Can be downloaded here: http://www.rapideuphoria.com/cgi-bin/asearch.exu?dos=on&win=on&lnx=on&gen=on&keywords=bernie+ryan
5. Re: An apology to Derek
- Posted by don cole <doncole at pacbell.net> Apr 04, 2007
- 497 views
- Last edited Apr 05, 2007
Bernie Ryan wrote: > > > Les Rogers is changing the Subject Line each time he replys > to a post which breaks and changes the threads to the next post. > That defeats the purpose of trying to follow a thread on a post > and messes up the archive threads. > > > Bernie > > My files in archive: > WMOTOR, XMOTOR, W32ENGIN, MIXEDLIB, EU_ENGIN, WIN32ERU, WIN32API > > Can be downloaded here: > <a > href="http://www.rapideuphoria.com/cgi-bin/asearch.exu?dos=on&win=on&lnx=on&gen=on&keywords=bernie+ryan">http://www.rapideuphoria.com/cgi-bin/asearch.exu?dos=on&win=on&lnx=on&gen=on&keywords=bernie+ryan</a> Actually this is true but I try to overlook because he is faily new. The original sumi-nija post was to Dekek and I probably should have just stayed out it. But many times I have seen posts to a specific party and that party does not come on line for a week or two. Or someone else buts in and answers the post. Which I like if I am in a hurry to get answers. I guess this is why it's called a forum. I take all this very tongue in cheek and I hope nobody gets offended. Don Cole
6. Re: An apology to Derek
- Posted by Derek Parnell <ddparnell at bigpond.com> Apr 05, 2007
- 496 views
don cole wrote: > > Hello again Derek, > > What happened, ... Actually, from my point of view, what happened was that you didn't 'address' your remarks. Normally with forum posts, when replying, one includes a portion of the post one is replying to, if only it is the person's name one is replying to, in order to indicate what you are replying to. Your remarks were bald. In that there was no identification in your reply post about what you were replying to. One cannot just rely on the "subject" line or knowledge of who was the initiating author. If people include some quoted text from the post they are replying to, the order that people post replies in doesn't matter so much. -- Derek Parnell Melbourne, Australia Skype name: derek.j.parnell
7. Re: An apology to Derek
- Posted by c.k.lester <euphoric at cklester.com> Apr 05, 2007
- 504 views
Why would you say that?
8. Re: An apology to Derek
- Posted by don cole <doncole at pacbell.net> Apr 05, 2007
- 508 views
That's very good.
9. Re: An apology to Derek
- Posted by C Bouzy <CBouzy at Egisca.com> Apr 06, 2007
- 501 views
c.k.lester wrote: > Why would you say that? LoL..... ~C Bouzy "If you do what you have always done, you will get what you always got."