1. Spam
- Posted by Michael Nelson <mike-nelson-ODAAT at WORLDNET.ATT.NET> Feb 23, 2000
- 591 views
OK nobody loves spam, but let's practice some tolerance. Greg has no history of spamming us and apologized for the accidental post. Quoting the original post in the apology was ill-judged but not ill-intended. Can we let it go and not have a flame war over this? -- Mike Nelson
2. Re: Spam
- Posted by "Lucius L. Hilley III" <lhilley at CDC.NET> Feb 23, 2000
- 531 views
> ---------------------- Information from the mail header ----------------------- > Sender: Euphoria Programming for MS-DOS <EUPHORIA at LISTSERV.MUOHIO.EDU> > Poster: Michael Nelson <mike-nelson-ODAAT at WORLDNET.ATT.NET> > Subject: Spam > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----- > > OK nobody loves spam, but let's practice some tolerance. Greg has no > history of spamming us and apologized for the accidental post. Quoting the > original post in the apology was ill-judged but not ill-intended. Can we > let it go and not have a flame war over this? > > -- Mike Nelson > I second that motion. I agree. Let's not flame. Lucius L. Hilley III lhilley at cdc.net +----------+--------------+--------------+ | Hollow | ICQ: 9638898 | AIM: LLHIII | | Horse +--------------+--------------+ | Software | http://www.cdc.net/~lhilley | +----------+-----------------------------+
3. Re: Spam
- Posted by Ralf Nieuwenhuijsen <nieuwen at XS4ALL.NL> Feb 23, 2000
- 545 views
- Last edited Feb 24, 2000
> OK nobody loves spam, but let's practice some tolerance. Greg has no > history of spamming us and apologized for the accidental post. Quoting the > original post in the apology was ill-judged but not ill-intended. Can we > let it go and not have a flame war over this? Tolerance rules. Ralf.
4. Re: Spam
- Posted by Everett Williams <rett at GVTC.COM> Feb 23, 2000
- 584 views
Lucius L. Hilley III wrote: >> >> OK nobody loves spam, but let's practice some tolerance. Greg has no >> history of spamming us and apologized for the accidental post. Quoting >the >> original post in the apology was ill-judged but not ill-intended. Can we >> let it go and not have a flame war over this? >> >> -- Mike Nelson >> > I second that motion. I agree. Let's not flame. > > Lucius L. Hilley III Saw second post of same length as first and fired before reading. My apologies. Sent personal note to Greg of same. Must say that I don't know of Greg and had no history to go on. As some of you well know, I ordinarily take anything personal offline. I don't consider spam personal, though I take it very personally. Spam interferes with the usage of this list...more so for those who must use the digest. I am perfectly happy to receive rants/discussions of almost any length on the subject at hand...Euphoria. Everett L.(Rett) Williams rett at gvtc.com
5. Spam
- Posted by Jeremy Peterson <ptl99 at hotmail.com> Apr 02, 2007
- 538 views
The filter seems to be slipping... "Cecil Calixtus" and "Sita Peiris" - all spam.
6. Re: Spam
- Posted by Al Getz <Xaxo at aol.com> Apr 02, 2007
- 544 views
Hi there, We've had this problem for a while now too at another web site that i moderate. The posters keep posting ads and it doesnt help to block their nick as they simply register with another nick and do the same thing and have the b***s to post the same darn post with the same stupid link to the same stupid site!! After deleting several hundred posts and more than 20 posts per day something more had to be done as it takes time to do all this work. To deal with this, the admins are making the registration process more 'machine unfriendly' by making the user type information read on the reg page where the information is typed using a very strange and varied font, something (presumably) a computer program can not do. Take care, Al E boa sorte com sua programacao Euphoria! My bumper sticker: "I brake for LED's" From "Black Knight": "I can live with losing the good fight, but i can not live without fighting it". "Well on second thought, maybe not."
7. Re: Spam
- Posted by Juergen Luethje <j.lue at gmx.de> Apr 02, 2007
- 550 views
Al Getz wrote: > Hi there, > > > We've had this problem for a while now too at another web site > that i moderate. The posters keep posting ads and it doesnt help > to block their nick as they simply register with another nick > and do the same thing and have the b***s to post the same darn post > with the same stupid link to the same stupid site!! > After deleting several hundred posts and more than 20 posts per > day something more had to be done as it takes time to do all this work. > To deal with this, the admins are making the registration process > more 'machine unfriendly' by making the user type information > read on the reg page where the information is typed using a very > strange and varied font, something (presumably) a computer program > can not do. You are talking about Captchas, aren't you? Here is some more information: http://sam.zoy.org/pwntcha/ Also interesting (probably easier to use for humans, and harder to "use" for machines than Captchas) are "Mawchas". I only have a German page at hand (look for the cross on the picture and click at it with the mouse): http://nögel.de/mawcha/index.php Regards, Juergen
8. Re: Spam
- Posted by Robert Craig <rds at RapidEuphoria.com> Apr 02, 2007
- 539 views
Jeremy Peterson wrote: > The filter seems to be slipping... "Cecil Calixtus" and "Sita Peiris" - all > spam. I'll tighten things up ... Regards, Rob Craig Rapid Deployment Software http://www.RapidEuphoria.com
9. Re: Spam
- Posted by Al Getz <Xaxo at aol.com> Apr 02, 2007
- 544 views
Juergen Luethje wrote: > > Al Getz wrote: > > > Hi there, > > > > > > We've had this problem for a while now too at another web site > > that i moderate. The posters keep posting ads and it doesnt help > > to block their nick as they simply register with another nick > > and do the same thing and have the b***s to post the same darn post > > with the same stupid link to the same stupid site!! > > After deleting several hundred posts and more than 20 posts per > > day something more had to be done as it takes time to do all this work. > > To deal with this, the admins are making the registration process > > more 'machine unfriendly' by making the user type information > > read on the reg page where the information is typed using a very > > strange and varied font, something (presumably) a computer program > > can not do. > > You are talking about Captchas, aren't you? Here is some more information: > <a href="http://sam.zoy.org/pwntcha/">http://sam.zoy.org/pwntcha/</a> > > Also interesting (probably easier to use for humans, and harder to > "use" for machines than Captchas) are "Mawchas". I only have a > German page at hand (look for the cross on the picture and click at > it with the mouse): > <a href="http://n">http://n</a>ögel.de/mawcha/index.php > > Regards, > Juergen hi Juergen, Yes, That's it! I guess the theory here is that if a computer can generate it then a computer can decode it, knowing the generator algorithm beforehand. The key here is "knowing the generator". It has to be complex enough to make reverse engineering very difficult. I dont know for sure how practical this is, but im sure it's of some use as it will at least takes care of some of the 'less knowledgable' computer driven posters. This gets kind of interesting in that a computer program has to try to determine if it is dealing with another computer program, as opposed to a human who is trying to tell. The more clever the algorithm the harder it will be for the 'impostor' to get by without detection. Then there is also the time line theory...will the impostor be able to keep up with the changes employed by the generator/detector? To do so it would have to be incredibly adaptive, not just simply be able to solve those problems which have been known for N weeks. Take care, Al E boa sorte com sua programacao Euphoria! My bumper sticker: "I brake for LED's" From "Black Knight": "I can live with losing the good fight, but i can not live without fighting it". "Well on second thought, maybe not."
10. Spam
- Posted by euman at bellsouth.net May 09, 2003
- 542 views
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_001D_01C3162F.2BF07A00 charset="iso-8859-1" Hello all, Has anyone written a SPAM utility in Euphoria? I found a pretty nice FREE utility here:=20 http://keir.net/k9.html Euman ------=_NextPart_000_001D_01C3162F.2BF07A00 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; = charset=3Diso-8859-1"> <META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1170" name=3DGENERATOR> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Hello all,</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Has anyone written a SPAM utility in=20 Euphoria?</FONT></DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I found a pretty nice FREE utility=20 here:</FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><A=20 href=3D"http://keir.net/k9.html">http://keir.net/k9.html</A></FONT></DIV>= <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> ------=_NextPart_000_001D_01C3162F.2BF07A00--