1. Hello
- Posted by Albert Brauneis <Dajawu36 at AOL.COM>
Nov 05, 1998
-
Last edited Nov 06, 1998
Hi,
Did anyone test out my program?
Albert
2. Hello
- Posted by xanax at bellsouth.net
Dec 09, 2002
Im new to this list and like the Euphoria language.
only wish we could do this:
integer var = val
instead of
integer var
var = val
Newby,
Xanax
3. Re: Hello
I just had to reply to this.......
Are you sure you're a newbie?
That name's very, very familiar. In fact, I saw it just last night.
Anyone care to take a guess?
>From: xanax at bellsouth.net
>Subject: Hello
>
>
>Im new to this list and like the Euphoria language.
>
>only wish we could do this:
> integer var = val
>instead of
> integer var
> var = val
>
>Newby,
>Xanax
>
Euphoria Instant Messenger
Have YOU Joined?
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/euim/
4. Re: Hello
> > Xanax,
> >
> > Welcome to the community!
>
> Yeas, welcome to the community, Euman!
Huh?!
5. Re: Hello
Kat understands....
Euphoria Instant Messenger
Have YOU Joined?
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/euim/
>From: "C. K. Lester" <cklester at yahoo.com>
>Subject: Re: Hello
>
>
> > > Xanax,
> > >
> > > Welcome to the community!
> >
> > Yeas, welcome to the community, Euman!
>
>Huh?!
>
>
>
6. Re: Hello
On 9 Dec 2002, at 13:17, C. K. Lester wrote:
>
> > > Xanax,
> > >
> > > Welcome to the community!
> >
> > Yeas, welcome to the community, Euman!
>
> Huh?!
Oh, sorry, i meant "yes".
Kat
7. Re: Hello
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kat" <kat at kogeijin.com>
To: "EUforum" <EUforum at topica.com>
Subject: Re: Hello
>
> On 9 Dec 2002, at 13:17, C. K. Lester wrote:
>
> >
> > > > Xanax,
> > > >
> > > > Welcome to the community!
> > >
> > > Yeas, welcome to the community, Euman!
> >
> > Huh?!
>
> Oh, sorry, i meant "yes".
<whew!> I thought maybe you meant "yeast," for which I'd still need an
explanation, or "seas," yet another explanation, or "years" or "yees"
(explain that one!).
Why do you suspect it is Euman?
8. Re: Hello
On 9 Dec 2002, at 13:31, C. K. Lester wrote:
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Kat" <kat at kogeijin.com>
> To: "EUforum" <EUforum at topica.com>
> Subject: Re: Hello
>
>
> > On 9 Dec 2002, at 13:17, C. K. Lester wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > > > Xanax,
> > > > >
> > > > > Welcome to the community!
> > > >
> > > > Yeas, welcome to the community, Euman!
> > >
> > > Huh?!
> >
> > Oh, sorry, i meant "yes".
>
> <whew!> I thought maybe you meant "yeast," for which I'd still need an
> explanation, or "seas," yet another explanation, or "years" or "yees"
> (explain that one!).
>
> Why do you suspect it is Euman?
Look at the headers. While it's possible to spoof a lot of the lines, it's very
difficult to spoof them all.
Kat
9. Re: Hello
I'd put my tokens on Euman!
-- Euler
On 9 Dec 2002, at 12:15, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote:
>
> I just had to reply to this.......
> Are you sure you're a newbie?
> That name's very, very familiar. In fact, I saw it just last night.
> Anyone care to take a guess?
>
> >From: xanax at bellsouth.net
> >Reply-To: EUforum at topica.com
> >To: EUforum <EUforum at topica.com>
> >Subject: Hello
> >Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 11:05:01 -0500
> >
> >
> >Im new to this list and like the Euphoria language.
> >
> >only wish we could do this:
> > integer var = val
> >instead of
> > integer var
> > var = val
> >
> >Newby,
> >Xanax
> >
>
> Euphoria Instant Messenger
> Have YOU Joined?
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/euim/
>
>
>
>
10. Re: Hello
> > Why do you suspect it is Euman?
>
> Look at the headers. While it's possible to spoof a lot of the lines, it's
very
> difficult to spoof them all.
Okay, then what's his motivation?
11. Re: Hello
On 9 Dec 2002, at 13:47, C. K. Lester wrote:
>
> > > Why do you suspect it is Euman?
> >
> > Look at the headers. While it's possible to spoof a lot of the lines, it's
> very
> > difficult to spoof them all.
>
> Okay, then what's his motivation?
I don't know, ask him.
Kat
12. Re: Hello
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gabriel Boehme" <gabrielboehme at hotmail.com>
To: "EUforum" <EUforum at topica.com>
Subject: RE: Hello
>
> I hope Rob doesn't mind if I copy his excellent
> explanation as to why "integer var = val" isn't permitted in Euphoria.
>
> Also, don't hesitate to use the "mailing list search" on the Euphoria
> website, as answers to this and many other questions can be found that
> way (that's how I found this).
>
> Cheerios,
> Gabriel
>
>
> Date: 12 Feb 2002
> From: Robert Craig <rds at RapidEuphoria.com>
> Subject: Re: A question about certain language features
>
> Ed Davis writes:
> > 1) Variables can not be initialized when declared, but
> > rather, must be initialized via an assignment statement.
> > Based on other languages, this seems like one of those
> > convenience type issues. Is there some programming
> > philosophy that says that an initialization in a declaration
> > is a 'bad thing'?
>
> It's not a "bad thing". In fact it seems like an obvious bit of
> convenience that couldn't possibly cause any harm.
> Since a lot of people have asked lately, here is my
> (very subjective) opinion on the matter. I've also
> included your question about private constant declarations.
>
> Suppose we allow:
>
> #1. variable inits: integer x = 99
>
> and if you allow #1, it would be even stranger (than it is now)
> not to allow:
>
> #2. constants declared inside a routine for use within that routine
> only
>
> So now you've got routines that start off with an arbitrary mixture
> of variable and constant declarations, some of the variables
> are assigned an initial value, some aren't. The only visual difference
> between a constant declaration and a variable declaration, is
> that people have to remind themselves that "constant" is not a type,
> it's something totally different. e.g.
[snip]
>Now whenever you examine a routine, instead of quickly skipping
>over the declarations, you will have to carefully
>wade through all the declarations, some containing
>function calls and complicated expressions, to figure out
>which code is going to be executed.
>
>Simply stated, you've got executable code hidden amongst the
>declarations, and constant declarations now look no different from
>variable declarations. Things used to be neatly separated and
>you could visually skip the declarations when mentally tracing
>execution. Now things are jumbled together.
Ahhh, so that's why we can't use executable code to assign some constants
and not others, and why we can't mix executable code and variable
declarations outside of routines. Its all so clear now.
----------------
cheers,
Derek Parnell
13. Re: Hello
Very wise EuMan,
sometimes we have to go extreme to get what we want, Rob can't u see, what
is happening? hear us out?
Jordah
----- Original Message -----
From: "Euler German" <efgerman at myrealbox.com>
To: "EUforum" <EUforum at topica.com>
Subject: Re: Hello
>
> I'd put my tokens on Euman!
>
> -- Euler
>
> On 9 Dec 2002, at 12:15, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote:
>
> >
> > I just had to reply to this.......
> > Are you sure you're a newbie?
> > That name's very, very familiar. In fact, I saw it just last night.
> > Anyone care to take a guess?
> >
> > >From: xanax at bellsouth.net
> > >Reply-To: EUforum at topica.com
> > >To: EUforum <EUforum at topica.com>
> > >Subject: Hello
> > >Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 11:05:01 -0500
> > >
> > >
> > >Im new to this list and like the Euphoria language.
> > >
> > >only wish we could do this:
> > > integer var = val
> > >instead of
> > > integer var
> > > var = val
> > >
> > >Newby,
> > >Xanax
> > >
> >
> > Euphoria Instant Messenger
> > Have YOU Joined?
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/euim/
> >
> >
>
>
>
14. Re: Hello
On 7 Dec 2002, at 9:24, jordah at btopenworld.com wrote:
>
> Very wise EuMan,
> sometimes we have to go extreme to get what we want, Rob can't u see, what
> is happening? hear us out?
Well, lets see what happens with OpenEu, if it goes anywhere. I suspect
RobC is close to losing the chance to hire these guys, and add useful
features to Eu, like i suggested he do 2 or 3 yrs ago.
Kat,
ole cursed Cassandra reincarnated <sigh>
> Jordah
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Euler German" <efgerman at myrealbox.com>
> To: "EUforum" <EUforum at topica.com>
> Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 7:40 PM
> Subject: Re: Hello
>
>
> > I'd put my tokens on Euman!
> >
> > -- Euler
> >
> > On 9 Dec 2002, at 12:15, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > I just had to reply to this.......
> > > Are you sure you're a newbie?
> > > That name's very, very familiar. In fact, I saw it just last night.
> > > Anyone care to take a guess?
> > >
> > > >From: xanax at bellsouth.net
> > > >Reply-To: EUforum at topica.com
> > > >To: EUforum <EUforum at topica.com>
> > > >Subject: Hello
> > > >Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 11:05:01 -0500
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >Im new to this list and like the Euphoria language.
> > > >
> > > >only wish we could do this:
> > > > integer var = val
> > > >instead of
> > > > integer var
> > > > var = val
> > > >
> > > >Newby,
> > > >Xanax
> > > >
> > >
> > > Euphoria Instant Messenger
> > > Have YOU Joined?
> > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/euim/
> > >
> > >
>
>
>
15. Hello
Hello all,
Just joined and already here is my first bozo question:
I notice there is no float() function.
Am I right in assuming that is the only distinction between the atom()
and integer() functions? I tested it and it seems to be true.
integer('a') returns true as I kind of expected. (& accept to be true)
Just being curious.
Pete
16. Re: Hello
On Thu, 3 Jan 2002 15:21:52 +0000, you wrote:
<snip>
>> I notice there is no float() function.
>> Am I right in assuming that is the only distinction between the atom()
>> and integer() functions? I tested it and it seems to be true.
<snipo>
> You can create your own float types by doing this:
>
>global
>type float( atom data )
> return ( data >= -3.4E38 and data <= 3.4E38 )
>end type
>--
>global
>type double( atom data )
> return ( data >= -1.7E308 and data <= 1.7E308 )
>end type
<snipoo>
Many thanks, informative but unfortunately not quite what I meant:
I shud'a ritten " *only* difference" which was the intrigue I had ;)
Pete
- I assume the values for float are entirely of your own making and
possibly from C or somesuch's ideas of float. (double==refman)
17. Hello
Hey everyone, I highly doubt anyone knows or remembers me, but about
five years ago, I was into the computer programming scene and all,
but it has been a while since I've done anything related to programming.
For the past five years, I served in the U.S. Navy, yet during those five
years, due to lack of time, I haven't been able to keep up with my skills,
so everything I used to know, I forgot, and the little I do remember,
has become obsolete, due to the constant change of technology. However,
now that I'm out, I've been wanting to get back into programming, even if
I have to re-learn everything from scratch.
Back before I joined the service, I made two minor contributions to the
Euphoria community, one was when I suggested that the message_box() function
use GetActiveWindow(), and the other was when I released a set of DLL linkage
routines. I was 16 at the time, and back then, it was nothing to me, but
looking over the code now, has me thinking "I wrote THAT?"
Now that I have more time to devote to getting back to the level I once
was on, I plan on doing so. I'm choosing Euphoria to start in helping me
re-teach myself, due to its portability, power, and ease of use.
Anyways, thank you for your time if you've read this.
Austin Cathey
http://www.myspace.com/agentgrey
agent_grey1982 at yahoo.com
ICQ #: 10166297
18. Re: Hello
Hello Austin,
I don't remember you but if you just did 5years in the Navy stay in there or
re-up. Don't make the mistake I did, quiting the Air Force after 4 yrs.
If you were 16 when you joined you will be 36 when you retire.
Plenty of time to start your computer career (with retirement pay and full
benifits). That last 15 yrs. will go by very quickly (believe me).
Don Cole
19. Re: Hello
On Fri, 2006-07-07 at 21:48 -0700, Austin Cathey wrote:
>
>
> posted by: Austin Cathey <agent_grey1982 at yahoo.com>
>
> Hey everyone, I highly doubt anyone knows or remembers me, but about
> five years ago, I was into the computer programming scene and all,
> but it has been a while since I've done anything related to programming.
> For the past five years, I served in the U.S. Navy, yet during those five
> years
Hello
Looking back now, I agree w/ Don Cole. If I had stayed in the U.S Navy
myself, I would be able to retire within the next 7mnths (full benefits)
and almost all major (paying companies) hire retired military much
faster than they would for you at this point. You still have time to
reconsider and even get a change into a career you really want such
an example "Operation Specialist" in 'A' school learn to program
and in Pensacola, Fla. they have a base just for "cryptography
education".
My $0.04 (inflation) do yourself a huge favor and go back to wearing
that fantastic uniform and retire....
I wish more people had suggested the same to me once I
got out. I was so tired of the politics at the time. I truly didn't
understand that even in Corporate America there are just as much
if not more politics, brown-noses, ill-educated a'-holes etc.
My first ship: http://www.usslexington.com/
May the Sun shine upon your face with the wind at your back!
Regards,
Euman
20. Re: Hello
...And just think, now that we are not in peace-time, there is still a
chance to go back and see some real action. Get shot at, blown-up, etc.
Cool.
21. Re: Hello
On Sat, 2006-07-08 at 10:17 -0700, Evan Marshall wrote:
> ...And just think, now that we are not in peace-time, there is still a
> chance to go back and see some real action. Get shot at, blown-up,
> etc.
> Cool.
Could it be that you have no idea that its a team effort to provide
the very freedoms we in the U.S enjoy...
One of the most respectable things a man or woman can do is give their
life in the defense of a Great Nation...
I don't know of any enlisted or commissioned military person who is a
conscientious objector or pacifist...(past, present or future)
Regards,
Euman
22. Re: Hello
I kindly ask you to stop this completely off-topic US-army discussion here!
Juergen
