1. Manual Content (was: Yay or Nay? Framed reference manual)

CChris wrote:
>  
> Please remove any reference to ed, it will put many potential users, used to
> Eclipse, Visual Studio, Notepa++ and such, off. We are no longer in 1993. Make
> it part of the stanard librry if you wish.
> 
> Please review the "24 reasons" list. Again, we are no longer in 1993, and some
> of the arguments there are outdated. As far as the debugger is concerned,
> anyone
> who ever used a modern debugger will disagree with the statements. This list
> is a credibility liability as it stands. Perhaps a third of it is still valid,
> hardly more.
> 

I was only formatting/organizing data, I was not planning on changing data. I
also saw several references that were out of date. Also, with the new standard
library, probably some new things should be addressed in the manual.

Is there someone who would want to help in this area? 

--
Jeremy Cowgar
http://jeremy.cowgar.com

new topic     » topic index » view message » categorize

2. Re: Manual Content (was: Yay or Nay? Framed reference manual)

Jeremy Cowgar wrote:
> 
> I was only formatting/organizing data, I was not planning on changing data.
> I also saw several references that were out of date. Also, with the new
> standard
> library, probably some new things should be addressed in the manual.
> 
> Is there someone who would want to help in this area? 
> 

Oh, also, if your not up to altering/editing content, there is other work to do
in the manuals. Currently, in the source .htx files for the manuals, there are
many places that include styled tags. I would love to get rid of all styled tags
and use a stylesheet for all styling. Font tags setting size and color are all
through the system, others setting face type, etc... These should all be changed
into div's or span's with an appropriate class descriptor.

--
Jeremy Cowgar
http://jeremy.cowgar.com

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view message » categorize

3. Re: Manual Content (was: Yay or Nay? Framed reference manual)

Jeremy Cowgar wrote:

> Oh, also, if your not up to altering/editing content, there is other work to
> do in the manuals. Currently, in the source .htx files for the manuals, there
> are many places that include styled tags. I would love to get rid of all
> styled
> tags and use a stylesheet for all styling. Font tags setting size and color
> are all through the system, others setting face type, etc... These should all
> be changed into div's or span's with an appropriate class descriptor.

If you use style sheet will be a lot more complicated to create the .doc files.

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Marco A. Achury
Caracas, Venezuela

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view message » categorize

4. Re: Manual Content (was: Yay or Nay? Framed reference manual)

Marco Achury wrote:
> 
> If you use style sheet will be a lot more complicated to create the .doc
> files.
> 

The .doc files actually strip all HTML tags, they are not dependent upon the
HTML styling. So, it should have no effect on the output of the .doc files.

--
Jeremy Cowgar
http://jeremy.cowgar.com

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view message » categorize

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu