1. strtok-v2.e addition
- Posted by Kat <gertie at PELL.NET> Jul 13, 2002
- 367 views
sorttok() is added now:
string = {"Red,Skelton,45,London,England",
"Lucy,Ball,56,Barre,North Dakota",
"Fred,Astaire,45,Alberta,Canada",
"Pierre,du Pont,56,Paris,France"}
string = sorttok(string,{3,-2},',')
-- sort by field3, then by reverse field2
string = {"Red,Skelton,45,London,England",
"Fred,Astaire,45,Alberta,Canada",
"Pierre,du Pont,56,Paris,France",
"Lucy,Ball,56,Barre,North Dakota"}
Kat
2. Re: strtok-v2.e addition
- Posted by Kat <gertie at PELL.NET> Jul 13, 2002
- 380 views
On 13 Jul 2002, at 8:32, Kat wrote:
>
> sorttok() is added now:
>
> string = {"Red,Skelton,45,London,England",
> "Lucy,Ball,56,Barre,North Dakota",
> "Fred,Astaire,45,Alberta,Canada",
> "Pierre,du Pont,56,Paris,France"}
>
> string = sorttok(string,{3,-2},',')
> -- sort by field3, then by reverse field2
>
> string = {"Red,Skelton,45,London,England",
> "Fred,Astaire,45,Alberta,Canada",
> "Pierre,du Pont,56,Paris,France",
> "Lucy,Ball,56,Barre,North Dakota"}
sortntok() is also working now.
Question: what is the best way to rename these for case-insensitivity?:
parse
deparse
matchtok
matchntok
wildtok
wildntok
findtok
gettok
addtok
puttok / changetok
reptok / repltok
sorttok
instok
istok
remtok
deltok
sortntok
Kat
3. strtok-v2.e addition
- Posted by Kat <gertie at PELL.NET> Jul 14, 2002
- 370 views
Ok, since i recieved no feedback on adding case-insensitivity to the strtok
library, i am adding it like this:
string = "a1 cat1 ba Cat1 da tac2"
findtok(string,"Cat1",{1},32) = 4
findtok(string,"Cat1",1,32) = 4
findtok(string,"Cat1",{"i",1},32) = 2
This makes the flag optional and doesn't break anything. So far, matchtok,
matchntok, wildtok, wildntok, and findtok can ignore the case of token and
string. Webpage and zip file are updated. Comments are welcome.
Kat
http://www.pell.net/warning/euphoria.html
4. Re: strtok-v2.e addition
- Posted by Robert Craig <rds at RapidEuphoria.com> Jul 18, 2002
- 373 views
Kat writes:
> Rob, how much time is spent on type checks?
User-defined type-checks involve a subroutine call
and usually a couple of comparisons. If you say:
without type_check
they won't happen.
If you are worried about performance,
you should try:
with profile
or
with profile_time
to see where the bottleneck really is.
It's quite often not where you expect.
Regards,
Rob Craig
Rapid Deployment Software
http://www.RapidEuphoria.com
5. Re: strtok-v2.e addition
- Posted by petelomax at blueyonder.co.uk Jul 19, 2002
- 359 views
{{{ On Thu, 18 Jul 2002 19:47:01 -0400, Robert Craig <rds at RapidEuphoria.com> wrote:
User-defined type-checks involve a subroutine call
and usually a couple of comparisons. If you say:
without type_check
they won't happen.
and usually a couple of comparisons. If you say:
without type_check
they won't happen.
DOH! AGAIN! I seem to be always repeatedly frightened off using Eu types 'cos I stupidly forget you can switch the (obvious) performance hit off once it all works.
It is a pretty cool concept though, I remember in the decipher contest coding a result type (or five) which trapped the program at near enuf the exact point it made a mistake...
(And yes, I remember hacking thru the code at 2am taking it all out..) </DOH> </AGAIN>
Pete
