1. Re: plans, ideas and RETT
>>Since these boys haven't been much exposed to my "corrosive"
>>influence, I wander where they got such ideas. Since both of
>>them seem to be experienced, production programmers, maybe
>>they are used to a different level of support and response from
>>a commercial product. Maybe they understand that lack of clear
>>input about the direction of the language makes it non-viable
>>for large efforts, especially commercial ones. I know that you
>>are a talented hobbyist, but I have seen nothing that indicates
>>to me that you have much understanding of or care for the world
>>of commercial quality software. That is not necessarily a defect
>>in your personality, but it does mean that you are unlikely to
>>easily understand my viewpoint.
Ahem, I think these "boys" can speak for themselves.
I don't think they need YOU to explain to us what YOU
_think_ they are trying to say. Putting "maybe" on the
front of a sentance dosn't change anything.
Here's a technical question:
*** DO YOU EVEN KNOW HOW TO CODE? ***
Or Are You Just Here To Kid Yourself That Anyone Cares
What Your Opinion Is?
Exactly what does this mean, pray tell?
Then why have you just posted a large letter on the subject, also
questioning Rob's integrity?
Is this not EXACTLY what you have just done?
THE AUDIENCE THAT YOU ARE USING TO SATISFY SOME CHILDISH EGO-URGE
IS HERE FOR ONE REASON ONLY:
They are here becasue ROBERT CRAIG produced an EXCELLENT programming
launguage. One that you continue use at the same time as you cast
aspersions on his character.
Clearly a supercilious idiot.
Nobody has subscribed to ANY list to hear your drivel.
Now do us all a favour and go tell somebody who gives a toss.
>>Everett L.(Rett) Williams
>>rett at gvtc.com
Graeme Burke.
