1. IDE conversion to win32lib 54 help coming
- Posted by Judith Evans <camping at FLASH.NET> Nov 25, 2000
- 398 views
- Last edited Nov 26, 2000
For those of you who want to convert IDE to win32lib.ew version 54 I have made changes to the IDE which require you to change only 3 statements. Everything relating to mouse x and y will be done for you. Routine names are not changed ( ex setPosition ). I'm giving Dan Moyer time to change his module if he needs to but I wanted to let everyone know this was going to be available. Thanks, Judith
2. Re: IDE conversion to win32lib 54 help coming
- Posted by Kat <gertie at PELL.NET> Nov 26, 2000
- 358 views
On 25 Nov 2000, at 19:55, Judith Evans wrote: > For those of you who want to convert IDE to win32lib.ew version 54 I have made > changes to the IDE which require you to change only 3 statements. Everything > relating to mouse x and y will be done for you. Routine names are not changed > ( ex setPosition ). Just a suggestion, if converting a minor version to another is that easy, what if the coder could simply tell the win32lib what version to act like? That way, you have complete backwards compatability, and programmers could spec "use the latest win32lib", rather than one of the hundreds of 0.xx versions out there now? I know you said the changes were to the IDE code, but still..... Kat
3. Re: IDE conversion to win32lib 54 help coming
- Posted by "Fam. Nieuwenhuijsen" <nieuwen at XS4ALL.NL> Nov 25, 2000
- 425 views
Doesn't have to be impossible, I think. Perhaps using a special code generation library that is part of each win32lib package rather than part of the IDE. Each and every IDE can than use this library to generate code, of whatever win32lib version. Sounds like a good idea ? Ralf N. nieuwen at xs4all.nl > Just a suggestion, if converting a minor version to another is that easy, > what if the coder could simply tell the win32lib what version to act like? > That way, you have complete backwards compatability, and programmers > could spec "use the latest win32lib", rather than one of the hundreds of > 0.xx versions out there now? I know you said the changes were to the IDE > code, but still..... > > Kat >