1. FreeBSD libs (OpenBSD problem)
- Posted by Hallvard Ystad <euphoria at babelserver.org>
Jan 01, 2006
-
Last edited Jan 02, 2006
Hi
I'm trying to install Euphoria on an OpenBSD machine using FreeBSD emulation.
But it doesn't work. Now can anyone confirm that Euphoria is built against the
FreeBSD 5 libraries? (If so, there's my problem...)
Thanks,
HY
Prætera censeo Carthaginem esse delendam
2. Re: FreeBSD libs (OpenBSD problem)
Hallvard Ystad wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I'm trying to install Euphoria on an OpenBSD machine using FreeBSD emulation.
> But it doesn't work. Now can anyone confirm that Euphoria is built against the
> FreeBSD 5 libraries? (If so, there's my problem...)
>
> Thanks,
> HY
> Prætera censeo Carthaginem esse delendam
Hi I don't know anything about FreeBSD, but I remember someone having trouble
installing Euphoria on his FreeBSD v5.4 box. When attempting to open EXU, he got
an error saying that libm.so.2 could not be found. It had turned out it had been
changed to libm.so.5 in FreeBSD v5.4 and that making a copy then renaming one to
libm.so.2 fixed the problem.
Also make sure that you have Ncurses installed and given execution permission to
the following files that will run in emulation mode:
chmod +x exu
chmod +x ecu
chmod +x backendu
Let me know if that helped any.
Regards,
Vincent
3. Re: FreeBSD libs (OpenBSD problem)
Hallvard Ystad wrote:
> I'm trying to install Euphoria on an OpenBSD machine using FreeBSD emulation.
> But it doesn't work. Now can anyone confirm that Euphoria is built against the
> FreeBSD 5 libraries? (If so, there's my problem...)
When I login to the FreeBSD machine I built Euphoria on,
I now see:
FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE (ADDRKERN) #0: Thu May 27 21:30:02 PDT 2004
I'm not sure if it said that when I built it
several months ago.
Regards,
Rob Craig
Rapid Deployment Software
http://www.RapidEuphoria.com
4. Re: FreeBSD libs (OpenBSD problem)
I don't know if this will work. What I do know, is that when I tried with
Euphoria 2.4, the installation worked fine.
So I now run Euphoria2.4 on OpenBSD3.8 in FreeBS emulation.
Thanks for your help anyway,
HY
Vincent wrote:
>
> Hallvard Ystad wrote:
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > I'm trying to install Euphoria on an OpenBSD machine using FreeBSD
> > emulation.
> > But it doesn't work. Now can anyone confirm that Euphoria is built against
> > the
> > FreeBSD 5 libraries? (If so, there's my problem...)
> >
> > Thanks,
> > HY
> > Prætera censeo Carthaginem esse delendam
>
> Hi I don't know anything about FreeBSD, but I remember someone having trouble
> installing Euphoria on his FreeBSD v5.4 box. When attempting to open EXU, he
> got an error saying that libm.so.2 could not be found. It had turned out it
> had been changed to libm.so.5 in FreeBSD v5.4 and that making a copy then
> renaming
> one to libm.so.2 fixed the problem.
>
> Also make sure that you have Ncurses installed and given execution permission
> to the following files that will run in emulation mode:
>
> chmod +x exu
> chmod +x ecu
> chmod +x backendu
>
> Let me know if that helped any.
>
>
> Regards,
> Vincent
Prætera censeo Carthaginem esse delendam
5. Re: FreeBSD libs (OpenBSD problem)
- Posted by Hallvard Ystad <euphoria at babelserver.org>
Jan 03, 2006
-
Last edited Jan 04, 2006
Robert Craig wrote:
> When I login to the FreeBSD machine I built Euphoria on,
> I now see:
> FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE (ADDRKERN) #0: Thu May 27 21:30:02 PDT 2004
>
> I'm not sure if it said that when I built it
> several months ago.
I'm sorry, I should have responded to this too.
Running 2.4, as I said, works perfectly fine. Running ldd on the 2.4
installation yields this result:
/usr/local/euphoria/bin/exu:
libm.so.2 => /usr/lib/libm.so.2 (0x48bc5000)
libc.so.4 => /usr/lib/libc.so.4 (0x4de3b000)
The FreeBSD emulation for OpenBSD does not yet support the FreeBSD 5 libraries.
...so I was pretty certain. But then, if you built Euphoria on a FreeBSD4.10
machine...
What does ldd yield on the euphoria build machine?
HY
Prætera censeo Carthaginem esse delendam
6. Re: FreeBSD libs (OpenBSD problem)
- Posted by Robert Craig <rds at RapidEuphoria.com>
Jan 03, 2006
-
Last edited Jan 04, 2006
Hallvard Ystad wrote:
> Robert Craig wrote:
> > When I login to the FreeBSD machine I built Euphoria on,
> > I now see:
> > FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE (ADDRKERN) #0: Thu May 27 21:30:02 PDT 2004
> >
> > I'm not sure if it said that when I built it
> > several months ago.
>
> I'm sorry, I should have responded to this too.
>
> Running 2.4, as I said, works perfectly fine. Running ldd on the 2.4
> installation
> yields this result:
> /usr/local/euphoria/bin/exu:
> libm.so.2 => /usr/lib/libm.so.2 (0x48bc5000)
> libc.so.4 => /usr/lib/libc.so.4 (0x4de3b000)
>
> The FreeBSD emulation for OpenBSD does not yet support the FreeBSD 5
> libraries.
> ...so I was pretty certain. But then, if you built Euphoria on a FreeBSD4.10
> machine...
>
> What does ldd yield on the euphoria build machine?
exu:
libm.so.2 => /usr/lib/libm.so.2 (0x280d3000)
libc.so.4 => /usr/lib/libc.so.4 (0x280ee000)
I don't know why 2.4 would work for you, but not 2.5.
No one else has reported that.
Regards,
Rob Craig
Rapid Deployment Software
http://www.RapidEuphoria.com
