1. Re[3]: (Another) (small) Eu 2.5 feature request.
- Posted by "William Heimbigner" <icxcnika at hotpop.com> Sep 23, 2004
- 474 views
----- Original Message ----- From: "aku saya" <akusaya at gmx.net> To: "William Heimbigner" <icxcnika at hotpop.com> Cc: <EUforum at topica.com> Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 2:31 PM Subject: Re[2]: (Another) (small) Eu 2.5 feature request. > > > >> Can cause ambiguity.. although it is nice looking > >> > >> what does a.b.2 mean? a[b][2] or a[b[2]] ? > >> > W> a[b][2] > W> however since you brought it up, > W> a.b..2 > W> could mean > W> a[b[2]] > > a.b..2 can also mean a[b..2] > > hehehe :D > better use another syntax? > Ok: plain and simple rule: x.y.z = x[y][z] <whip cracks>back in the box, kitty! > > >
2. Re: Re[3]: (Another) (small) Eu 2.5 feature request.
- Posted by "Kat" <gertie at visionsix.com> Sep 23, 2004
- 480 views
- Last edited Sep 24, 2004
On 23 Sep 2004, at 14:54, William Heimbigner wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "aku saya" <akusaya at gmx.net> > To: "William Heimbigner" <icxcnika at hotpop.com> > Cc: <EUforum at topica.com> > Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 2:31 PM > Subject: Re[2]: (Another) (small) Eu 2.5 feature request. > > > > >> Can cause ambiguity.. although it is nice looking > > >> > > >> what does a.b.2 mean? a[b][2] or a[b[2]] ? > > >> > > W> a[b][2] > > W> however since you brought it up, > > W> a.b..2 > > W> could mean > > W> a[b[2]] > > > > a.b..2 can also mean a[b..2] > > > > hehehe :D > > better use another syntax? > > > Ok: plain and simple rule: > x.y.z > = > x[y][z] > <whip cracks>back in the box, kitty! /me whines What about using Jiri's associated lists? Then you can call the vars what you want, search for a name1.name2.name3 in any order of name2.name3.name1, as well as mess with the indexing. And know what's there too, with a search for a wildmatch. This is *very* handy in mirc. Kat
3. Re: Re[3]: (Another) (small) Eu 2.5 feature request.
- Posted by Matt Lewis <matthewwalkerlewis at yahoo.com> Sep 24, 2004
- 488 views
William Heimbigner wrote: > > Ok: plain and simple rule: > x.y.z > = > x[y][z] > <whip cracks>back in the box, kitty! This isn't much of a change. It's some syntactic sugar that IMHO really doesn't add a whole lot (not nearly as useful as the pending $ feature). If you're really interested in this, you probably want a preprocessor. David Cuny already did this (note: it's always a good idea to search for his contributions before you try to code something, cause he probably already did it!): http://www.rapideuphoria.com/dot.zip Matt Lewis