1. Re[3]: (Another) (small) Eu 2.5 feature request.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "aku saya" <akusaya at gmx.net>
To: "William Heimbigner" <icxcnika at hotpop.com>
Cc: <EUforum at topica.com>
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 2:31 PM
Subject: Re[2]: (Another) (small) Eu 2.5 feature request.


> 
> 
> >> Can cause ambiguity.. although it is nice looking
> >> 
> >> what does a.b.2 mean? a[b][2] or a[b[2]] ?
> >> 
> W> a[b][2]
> W> however since you brought it up,
> W> a.b..2
> W> could mean
> W> a[b[2]]
> 
> a.b..2 can also mean a[b..2]
> 
> hehehe :D
> better use another syntax?
> 
Ok: plain and simple rule:
x.y.z
=
x[y][z]
<whip cracks>back in the box, kitty!

> 
> 
>

new topic     » topic index » view message » categorize

2. Re: Re[3]: (Another) (small) Eu 2.5 feature request.

On 23 Sep 2004, at 14:54, William Heimbigner wrote:

> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "aku saya" <akusaya at gmx.net>
> To: "William Heimbigner" <icxcnika at hotpop.com>
> Cc: <EUforum at topica.com>
> Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 2:31 PM
> Subject: Re[2]: (Another) (small) Eu 2.5 feature request.
> 
> 
> > >> Can cause ambiguity.. although it is nice looking
> > >> 
> > >> what does a.b.2 mean? a[b][2] or a[b[2]] ?
> > >> 
> > W> a[b][2]
> > W> however since you brought it up,
> > W> a.b..2
> > W> could mean
> > W> a[b[2]]
> > 
> > a.b..2 can also mean a[b..2]
> > 
> > hehehe :D
> > better use another syntax?
> > 
> Ok: plain and simple rule:
> x.y.z
> =
> x[y][z]
> <whip cracks>back in the box, kitty!

/me whines

What about using Jiri's associated lists? Then you can call the vars what you 
want, search for a name1.name2.name3 in any order of 
name2.name3.name1, as well as mess with the indexing. And know what's 
there too, with a search for a wildmatch. This is *very* handy in mirc.

Kat

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view message » categorize

3. Re: Re[3]: (Another) (small) Eu 2.5 feature request.

William Heimbigner wrote:
> 
> Ok: plain and simple rule:
> x.y.z
> =
> x[y][z]
> <whip cracks>back in the box, kitty!

This isn't much of a change.  It's some syntactic sugar that IMHO really
doesn't add a whole lot (not nearly as useful as the pending $ feature).
If you're really interested in this, you probably want a preprocessor.

David Cuny already did this (note:  it's always a good idea to search for
his contributions before you try to code something, cause he probably 
already did it!):

http://www.rapideuphoria.com/dot.zip

Matt Lewis

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view message » categorize

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu