1. Ping Juergen - bit.e functions
I was just looking at bit.e and noticed that there were several
opcodes not supported by asm.e, so I coded some example lines
up and then disassembled them with OllyDebug (although that does
not understand bts or btr). Anyway, I thought this partial listing
may be of interest, no worries if not:
--00402E7A 8B4424 04 MOV EAX,DWORD PTR SS:[ESP+4]
--00402E7E 58 POP EAX
--00402E7F 8B4C24 08 MOV ECX,DWORD PTR SS:[ESP+8]
--00402E83 59 POP ECX
--00402E84 0FABC8 bts eax,ecx
--00402E87 0FB3C8 btr eax,ecx
--00402E8A 0FA3C8 BT EAX,ECX
--00402E8D 0F92C0 SETB AL
--00402E90 25 01000000 AND EAX,1
--00402E95 31C0 XOR EAX,EAX
--00402E97 0FBCC1 BSF EAX,ECX
--00402E9A 0FBDC1 BSR EAX,ECX
--00402E9D C2 0800 RETN 8
--00402EA0 C3 RETN
Regards,
Pete
2. Re: Ping Juergen - bit.e functions
Pete Lomax wrote:
> I was just looking at bit.e and noticed that there were several
> opcodes not supported by asm.e, so I coded some example lines
> up and then disassembled them with OllyDebug (although that does
> not understand bts or btr). Anyway, I thought this partial listing
> may be of interest, no worries if not:
>
> --00402E7A 8B4424 04 MOV EAX,DWORD PTR SS:[ESP+4]
> --00402E7E 58 POP EAX
> --00402E7F 8B4C24 08 MOV ECX,DWORD PTR SS:[ESP+8]
> --00402E83 59 POP ECX
> --00402E84 0FABC8 bts eax,ecx
> --00402E87 0FB3C8 btr eax,ecx
> --00402E8A 0FA3C8 BT EAX,ECX
> --00402E8D 0F92C0 SETB AL
> --00402E90 25 01000000 AND EAX,1
> --00402E95 31C0 XOR EAX,EAX
> --00402E97 0FBCC1 BSF EAX,ECX
> --00402E9A 0FBDC1 BSR EAX,ECX
> --00402E9D C2 0800 RETN 8
> --00402EA0 C3 RETN
Very much appreciated, I'll try it out as soon as possible.
Thank you very much, Pete!
Regards,
Juergen
--
A: Because it considerably reduces the readability of the text.
Q: Why?
A: Top posting.
Q: What is annoying in e-mail and news?
3. Re: Ping Juergen - bit.e functions
Heh, I guess I'm a bit guilty of that... Thing is - it's perfectly
readable to me, because of the way Gmail handles it...
On Thu, 02 Sep 2004 07:56:00 +0200, Juergen Luethje <j.lue at gmx.de> wrote:
> A: Because it considerably reduces the readability of the text.
> Q: Why?
> A: Top posting.
> Q: What is annoying in e-mail and news?
--
MrTrick
4. Re: Ping Juergen - bit.e functions
Juergen Luethje wrote:
> A: Because it considerably reduces the readability of the text.
>> Q: Why?
>>> A: Top posting.
>>>> Q: What is annoying in e-mail and news?
LOL. Sweet.
--
Derek Parnell
Melbourne, Australia
5. Re: Ping Juergen - bit.e functions
Me wrote:
> Pete Lomax wrote:
>
>> I was just looking at bit.e and noticed that there were several
>> opcodes not supported by asm.e, so I coded some example lines
>> up and then disassembled them with OllyDebug (although that does
>> not understand bts or btr). Anyway, I thought this partial listing
>> may be of interest, no worries if not:
[opcodes snipped]
> Very much appreciated, I'll try it out as soon as possible.
> Thank you very much, Pete!
Your opcodes work fine, I've released the new version of 'bit.e'
yesterday. Thanks again!
Regards,
Juergen
--
A: Because it considerably reduces the readability of the text.
Q: Why?
A: Top posting.
Q: What is annoying in e-mail and news?
