1. New translator -- registered version?
- Posted by Andy Serpa <ac at onehorseshy.com>
Feb 19, 2006
-
Last edited Feb 20, 2006
Is it all right to use the new ecw.exe with the old (registered) versions of the
translator .lib files? If not, will registered translator users be given updated
.lib files?
2. Re: New translator -- registered version?
- Posted by Robert Craig <rds at RapidEuphoria.com>
Feb 19, 2006
-
Last edited Feb 20, 2006
Andy Serpa wrote:
> Is it all right to use the new ecw.exe with the old (registered) versions of
> the translator .lib files?
I don't think it would work, and there would be no point
in doing that, since the old .lib's are missing
lots of multitasking code, which is the main reason
you might want to use the new translator.
> If not, will registered translator users be given
> updated .lib files?
I'd like to wait for 3.0 alpha, before I start worrying
about building/testing/distributing new multitasking-enabled
registered .libs. If you have some killer multitasking app
to donate to User Contributions, I guess I could make an exception.
Regards,
Rob Craig
Rapid Deployment Software
http://www.RapidEuphoria.com
3. Re: New translator -- registered version?
- Posted by Andy Serpa <ac at onehorseshy.com>
Feb 19, 2006
-
Last edited Feb 20, 2006
Robert Craig wrote:
>
> Andy Serpa wrote:
> > Is it all right to use the new ecw.exe with the old (registered) versions of
> > the translator .lib files?
>
> I don't think it would work, and there would be no point
> in doing that, since the old .lib's are missing
> lots of multitasking code, which is the main reason
> you might want to use the new translator.
>
> > If not, will registered translator users be given
> > updated .lib files?
>
> I'd like to wait for 3.0 alpha, before I start worrying
> about building/testing/distributing new multitasking-enabled
> registered .libs. If you have some killer multitasking app
> to donate to User Contributions, I guess I could make an exception.
>
No, I just wanted to use Watcom 1.4...
