1. dot net
- Posted by George Walters <gwalters at sc.rr.com>
Feb 16, 2006
-
Last edited Feb 17, 2006
Anyone have, or working on, a dot net type of capability link with euphoria?
2. Re: dot net
- Posted by Ron Weidner <xecronix at yahoo.com>
Feb 16, 2006
-
Last edited Feb 17, 2006
> Anyone have, or working on, a dot net type of
> capability link with euphoria?
>
Maybe. Please elaborate.
--
Ronald Weidner
http://www.techport80.com
PHP Software developer for hire.
3. Re: dot net
George Walters wrote:
>
> Anyone have, or working on, a dot net type of capability link with euphoria?
Yes. I've been looking into translating Eu il code into CLI il code that
can be compiled with ilasm--part of DotNet. I've had some promising results
so far. Obviously, from there, it should be fairly easy to allow Euphoria
to use anything else (i.e., WinForms) that's written in DotNet.
Matt Lewis
4. Re: dot net
Matt Lewis wrote:
> George Walters wrote:
> >
> > Anyone have, or working on, a dot net type of capability link with euphoria?
> Yes. I've been looking into translating Eu il code into CLI il code that
> can be compiled with ilasm--part of DotNet. I've had some promising results
> so far. Obviously, from there, it should be fairly easy to allow Euphoria
> to use anything else (i.e., WinForms) that's written in DotNet.
You don't even need ILASM to compile: if you use the Reflection.Emit classes,
you can compile code from within your own application.
--
The Internet combines the excitement of typing
with the reliability of anonymous hearsay.
tommy online: http://users.telenet.be/tommycarlier
tommy.blog: http://tommycarlier.blogspot.com
5. Re: dot net
- Posted by Vincent <darkvincentdude at yahoo.com>
Feb 19, 2006
-
Last edited Feb 20, 2006
Matt Lewis wrote:
>
> George Walters wrote:
> >
> > Anyone have, or working on, a dot net type of capability link with euphoria?
>
> Yes. I've been looking into translating Eu il code into CLI il code that
> can be compiled with ilasm--part of DotNet. I've had some promising results
> so far. Obviously, from there, it should be fairly easy to allow Euphoria
> to use anything else (i.e., WinForms) that's written in DotNet.
>
> Matt Lewis
Cool! That could really open up alot of alot of oppurtunity for Euphoria. In
fact, RDS might even be able to make a (Windows only) translator option out of
it.
Like maybe "-dotnet" *OR* "-msil"
Instead of the translator producing C source code, it could product MSIL that
could be executed with the .NET framework JIT compilers.
Regards,
Vincent
6. Re: dot net
Tommy Carlier wrote:
>
> Matt Lewis wrote:
> > George Walters wrote:
> > >
> > > Anyone have, or working on, a dot net type of capability link with
> > > euphoria?
> > Yes. I've been looking into translating Eu il code into CLI il code that
> > can be compiled with ilasm--part of DotNet. I've had some promising results
> > so far. Obviously, from there, it should be fairly easy to allow Euphoria
> > to use anything else (i.e., WinForms) that's written in DotNet.
>
> You don't even need ILASM to compile: if you use the Reflection.Emit classes,
> you can compile code from within your own application.
>
Yes, and that's an integral part of my plan, but first you need a dotnet
executable. Basically, I'm writing a lot of the backend stuff in C#, then
decompiling that to il code (yes, I could make it an external assembly, and
that will likely be an option). I have a program that takes a 'shrouded'
ooeu program, and translates that into il code. Then I'm calling ilasm
to put it all into an exe.
I need to rewrite the way it represents Euphoria data--it's not very elegant
or efficient, although with a minor change to the code, I was able to get
the sieve benchmark to run faster than with a translated ooeu backend, so
it's at least possible to get better performance than currently possible.
It's also possible that it could work with Mono, so it could be cross
platform, too. Still lots of work to be done...
Matt Lewis
