1. Euphoria design
- Posted by Hendy Irawan <ceefour at INDO.NET.ID>
Dec 30, 1998
-
Last edited Dec 31, 1998
I just wanna express my thought about something.
I like Euphoria. I like C and C++ (hey, it's the most flexible and
advanced language I've ever used, well...). I like Pascal, since
it's the first (programming) language I've ever known.
I like Euphoria because it is flexible. It also simplifies some
programming tasks (well, quite a lot at times). But, the bad thing
shows when it comes to writing code. I think Euphoria's is too
"descriptive", more like Pascal but even more (hey, "end procedure"?
"end if"?) Well, even sort of Basic.
Well, getting code to read is okay. But I think those cryptic
(C,C++,Java?!) codes are okay. I mean, I really love to write this:
(C++)
a=b=0;
instead of this: (Pascal)
a:=0;
b:=0;
And I don't really like the use of
some symbols which aren't really "standard" (okay I know they're
language dependent).
Okay.....okay....... It's a "very" high level programming language
anyway. But...
And will (it be possible for) Euphoria (to) have platform-dependent
compiled code?
And one more question, since I am total newbie, does (or will?) Eu support
inline assembler statements?
Please don't forget replying,
C-4 | ICQ: 2989521
WinErr: 003 Dynamic linking error - Your mistake is now in every file
It's good for you...
The Delphi Super Page!
http://sunsite.icm.edu.pl/delphi
