1. Pixel Bot Wars
- Posted by "Bown, John" <John.Bown at UK.ORIGIN-IT.COM> Nov 06, 1998
- 475 views
I like the idea of Battling Euphoria Pixel Bots ... A similar type of 'competition' has been running for a while now that has been orientated towards robots designed using Arizona Microchip PIC processors. Although specifically targeted at PIC users there may be some things that could be considered if we are going to 'do battle' on a grand scale. Check out ... http://www.innovatus.com/PICBots.html In the spirit of proper project management we need ... 1) The goals of what we're attempting to do / achieve defined 2) The 'battle environment' ( Euphoria wrapper ) defining 3) The calls that a particular Pixel Bot can make use to do / see things defined 4) Someone to be given a humongous salary to be a co-ordinating committe chairperson 5) Jam biscuits and cups of tea / coffee ( no java ) I think Pixel Bots is a brilliant idea. Providing the harness is well written / well documented as are the individual Pixel Bot programs this may also serve as the 'Beginner's tutorial' and 'examples' that have also been discussed. For those who don't like the idea of having mass-murdering Pixel Bots; we could have two ( or more ) classes [ oh no, object orientation ! ], psychotic and cowardly - they can either choose to fight or hide in the corner achieving whatever goal they want. I shall think on this over the weekend.
2. Re: Pixel Bot Wars
- Posted by Warren Baker <wcbaker at HOME.COM> Nov 06, 1998
- 478 views
----- >For those who don't like the idea of having mass-murdering Pixel Bots; >we could have two ( or more ) classes [ oh no, object orientation ! ], >psychotic and cowardly - they can either choose to fight or hide in the >corner achieving whatever goal they want. If you want to give an alternative to "murder bots", why does the only choice have to be hiding/cowardly?? If you want an alternative and you want some interesting programming, then why can't there be (yes, it exists!) COOPERATION? So certain bots could possibly form a team and share certain information (this has to be agreed upon) so that the knowledge of one helps the others (again the bounds would have to be agreed upon -- perhaps information could only be shared if the bots "meet" accidently, for example). There could be individualistic bots and cooperative bots. It doesn't have to be overly complex, but simple information sharing between certain bots. Hell, you could even have a "mis-information" bot whose identity nobody knows. This creature would deliberately give false information -- there would have to be the possibility of discovery of malicious intent, too. . . This could be quite entertaining. --Warren
3. Re: Pixel Bot Wars
- Posted by C & K L <candkNOSPAM2ME at TICNET.COM> Nov 06, 1998
- 454 views
"Bown, John" wrote: > I like the idea of Battling Euphoria Pixel Bots ... It's getting more exciting by the message! See the web page at http://www.ticnet.com/thelesters/eubots/start.htm for a starting/continuing model for this whole deal. Right now I'm in the process of adding a start and finish position into Ralf's mazer, although if he were to do that it would be even more excellent. :^)
4. Re: Pixel Bot Wars
- Posted by Irv Mullins <irv at ELLIJAY.COM> Nov 06, 1998
- 479 views
On Fri, 6 Nov 1998 10:42:42 -0800, Warren Baker <wcbaker at HOME.COM> wrote: >----- >>For those who don't like the idea of having mass-murdering Pixel Bots; >>we could have two ( or more ) classes [ oh no, object orientation ! ], >>psychotic and cowardly - they can either choose to fight or hide in the >>corner achieving whatever goal they want. > > >If you want to give an alternative to "murder bots", why does the only >choice have to be hiding/cowardly?? If you want an alternative and you want >some interesting programming, then why can't there be (yes, it exists!) >COOPERATION? So certain bots could possibly form a team and share certain >information ... Hell, you could even have a "mis-information" bot whose >identity nobody knows. This creature would deliberately give false >information -- there would have to be the possibility of discovery of >malicious intent, too. . . > >This could be quite entertaining. Yes - and well trained mis-information bots are available in Washington by the gross. Literally. Irv
5. Re: Pixel Bot Wars
- Posted by Ralf Nieuwenhuijsen <nieuwen at XS4ALL.NL> Nov 07, 1998
- 455 views
include mazer.e include flavours.e sequence maze_image maze_image = mazer ({600,400}, flv_die_hard (25, {300,200},1)) maze_image[1][2..24] = 2 maze_image[600][376..399] = 3 If it hits a wall of color 2, its the beginning position, or whatever. If it hits a wall of color 3, its the end position. You could also, put a circle somewhere in it, or a small box, but two vertical lines seemed easier.. Ralf
6. Re: Pixel Bot Wars
- Posted by JJProg at CYBERBURY.NET Nov 06, 1998
- 451 views
I think we should put up a web site for this so it is organized, or it will fail like the previous attempt. I could put up a web page and write some code for it. Jeffrey Fielding JJProg at cyberbury.net
7. Re: Pixel Bot Wars
- Posted by C & K L <candk at TICNET.COM> Nov 06, 1998
- 473 views
I have something started at the following: http://www.ticnet.com/thelesters/eubots/ JJProg at CYBERBURY.NET wrote: > > I think we should put up a web site for this so it is organized, or it > will fail like the previous attempt. I could put up a web page and write > some code for it. > > Jeffrey Fielding > JJProg at cyberbury.net