1. Peu on SunOS 5.6 .. BUG
- Posted by Humberto Yeverino <humberto at ENGR.CSUFRESNO.EDU> Nov 05, 1998
- 522 views
I tried compiling Peu for SunOS 5.6 with gcc and ran into a big problem. If I try to call a procedure or function defined in my program I get a Segmentation fault. Side note: to get Peu.c to compile I had to move the #define version 0.50 from the beginning to after the #includes. Also, is there a seperate list for Peu? I looked on Pete's web page and couldn't find any Peu related posts on his message board. -Humberto Yeverino Jr. "I kick ass for the Lord." -Dead Alive (1992) *********************************************************** Home Page: http://www.engr.csufresno.edu/~humberto/Home.html Ti Page: http://www.engr.csufresno.edu/~humberto/tex.html z80 Source Page: http://www.engr.csufresno.edu/~humberto/z80source.html Official Tyrant Home Page: http://www.engr.csufresno.edu/~humberto/tyrant.html E-mail: humberto at engr.csufresno.edu ***********************************************************
2. Re: Peu on SunOS 5.6 .. BUG
- Posted by Pete Eberlein <xseal at HARBORSIDE.COM> Nov 05, 1998
- 517 views
> I tried compiling Peu for SunOS 5.6 with gcc and ran into a big problem. > If I try to call a procedure or function defined in my program I get a > Segmentation fault. Yeah, I'm aware of this failure on SunOS, the HP computers here at school are all running that version too. I haven't figured out what causes the segfault, but its probably due to some evil pointer casting in Peu. > Side note: to get Peu.c to compile I had to move the #define version > 0.5 from the beginning to after the #includes. Hmmm... maybe a conflict in the standard include files? > Also, is there a seperate list for Peu? I looked on Pete's web page and > couldn't find any Peu related posts on his message board. Well, you could always post some> -Humberto Yeverino Jr. But the good news is: the next version of Peu (v 0.11) is underway. I've totally rewritten the core bytecode interpreter and now the rest of the C source will eventually follow suit. The current new edition only handles constants, integers, addition and "?". Though I'm curious how quickly the rewrite will go, compared to the first development, which seemed to come out nowhere this summer. I still can't figure out how I did it in such a short time. Victims, er... "volunteers" are always welcome to test the code with various C compilers on various operating systems. Laters all, _______ ______ _______ ______ [ _ \[ _ ][ _ _ ][ _ ] [/| [_] |[/| [_\][/ | | \][/| [_\] | ___/ | _] | | | _] [\| [/] [\| [_/] [\| |/] [\| [_/] [_____] [______] [_____] [______] xseal at harborside.com ICQ:13466657 http://www.harborside.com/home/x/xseal/euphoria/