1. RE: Bugs in latest IDE (0.18.6o)
Judith wrote:
>
>
> You can select multiple background layers with right-click but you must
> hold
> down Ctrl+rightClick. If you ever right-click the tab which has focus
> all
> backgrounds are removed.
Thanks, I think this should be added to the hint text when you point to
the layers tabs, it doesn't say that there.
>
> Are you Saving configurations after you uncheck "One instance of IDE"?
> I'm
> not talking about Saving the project but using the Save button on the
> configurations screen. This selection is placed in ide.cfg when
> configurations saved and read when IDE begins. Then IDE determines
> whether
> the additional instance can continue or if it shuts down. If you do not
> Save
> in configurations then IDE.cfg does not have that information.
Yes, I did hit save, and it is still checked when restarted, but unless
I uncheck and recheck the "1 instance of IDE" checkbox, it doesn't allow
another IDE to run.
>
> The other two are bugs and thanks for reporting them.
> ~judith
>
> CoJaBo wrote:
> The delete active window button on the toolbar won't work, but the one
> in the menu works.
>
> 2 windows merge into one if you undo deleating a layer or window.
>
> IDE should let you select more than 1 background layer by right clicking
> layer tabs.
>
> Still a problem with running 2 IDEs at a time, only works after you
> uncheck/recheck "1 instance of IDE" checkbox.
>
> Please fix theese ASAP.
>
>
2. RE: Bugs in latest IDE (0.18.6o)
Also, if I put my computer in standby mode or logoff, I get a zillion
warning messages.
Adding:
setWarning(0)
somewere in IDE should correct this, the warnings are harmless, but
annoying.
Also, it would be nice to be able to have more than one code editor open
in IDE, but that can be done later.
3. RE: Bugs in latest IDE (0.18.6o)
CoJaBo wrote:
>
>
> Judith wrote:
> >
> >
> > You can select multiple background layers with right-click but you must
> > hold
> > down Ctrl+rightClick. If you ever right-click the tab which has focus
> > all
> > backgrounds are removed.
>
> Thanks, I think this should be added to the hint text when you point to
> the layers tabs, it doesn't say that there.
>
> >
> > Are you Saving configurations after you uncheck "One instance of IDE"?
> > I'm
> > not talking about Saving the project but using the Save button on the
> > configurations screen. This selection is placed in ide.cfg when
> > configurations saved and read when IDE begins. Then IDE determines
> > whether
> > the additional instance can continue or if it shuts down. If you do not
> > Save
> > in configurations then IDE.cfg does not have that information.
>
> Yes, I did hit save, and it is still checked when restarted, but unless
> I uncheck and recheck the "1 instance of IDE" checkbox, it doesn't allow
>
> another IDE to run.
>
Found the problem, there was an IDE running with that option turned off,
but the window wasn't showing up on the taskbar so I didn't know it was
running. That was weird...
> >
> > The other two are bugs and thanks for reporting them.
> > ~judith
> >
> > CoJaBo wrote:
> > The delete active window button on the toolbar won't work, but the one
> > in the menu works.
> >
> > 2 windows merge into one if you undo deleating a layer or window.
> >
> > IDE should let you select more than 1 background layer by right clicking
> > layer tabs.
> >
> > Still a problem with running 2 IDEs at a time, only works after you
> > uncheck/recheck "1 instance of IDE" checkbox.
> >
> > Please fix theese ASAP.
> >
> >
4. RE: Bugs in latest IDE (0.18.6o)
Last one I think:
In IDE:
If you type in the project name without ".prj" it displays an error, I
don't see why it couldn't just add ".prj" to the end of the name.
In Editor.exw:
There should be an option to enable hilighting for all files, not just
the defaults.
CoJaBo wrote:
>
>
> Also, if I put my computer in standby mode or logoff, I get a zillion
> warning messages.
> Adding:
> setWarning(0)
> somewere in IDE should correct this, the warnings are harmless, but
> annoying.
>
> Also, it would be nice to be able to have more than one code editor open
>
> in IDE, but that can be done later.
>
5. RE: Bugs in latest IDE (0.18.6o)
Requests for Multiple Code Editors have come up many times. The present
structure of Code Editor does not lend itself well to multiple instances.
However I have an idea or two on the back-burner for a future release. I
want to get IDE stable and most bugs out before I start requests such as
multiple Code Editors, plugins and custom controls. Release 0.19.0 (coming
next after the 0.18.n series of bug fixes) will concentrate on improving IDE
internally, overhaul IDE.htm and set up some new routines which will pave
the way for Code Editor enhancements.
The error messages from getOpenFileName and getSaveFileName come from
win32lib routines. I notice there is an offering in Recent Contributions
that will help with getSaveFileName. Can anyone work up getOpenFileName to
supply the ext from FileTypes if user does not enter the ext?
I'm unclear which files you want highlighted. If you mean non
Win32lib/Euphoria files then they are Euphoria and Win32lib highlighted
already. Those added to the project also have their global routines
highlighted. Some of the support files that come in the Win32lib package are
not currently highlighted. You can run winlibscan.exw in the IDE
distribution and indicate all the win32lib associated files you want syntax
colored. This program is useful also when changing to newer versions of
win32lib to update the syntax list for new routine names.
I've fixed the problem with UnDo and will be distributing IDE 0.18.6p in a
few days.
I will make the other changes you have requested for 0.18.6p.
Thanks for reporting these problems.
Since 0.19.0 may take longer than the normal 2-3 month turn-around, expect
several updates within a week or two time frame until all reported bugs
(that I know how to fix) are removed. After that time it may be 4-6 months
before 0.19.0 is available.
~judith
CoJaBo wrote:
Also, if I put my computer in standby mode or logoff, I get a zillion
warning messages.
Adding:
setWarning(0)
somewere in IDE should correct this, the warnings are harmless, but
annoying.
Also, it would be nice to be able to have more than one code editor open
in IDE, but that can be done later.
In IDE:
If you type in the project name without ".prj" it displays an error, I
don't see why it couldn't just add ".prj" to the end of the name.
In Editor.exw:
There should be an option to enable hilighting for all files, not just
the defaults.
I think this (about control+right-click) should be added to the hint text
when you point to
the layers tabs, it doesn't say that there.
6. RE: Bugs in latest IDE (0.18.6o)
Judith wrote:
>
>
> Requests for Multiple Code Editors have come up many times. The present
> structure of Code Editor does not lend itself well to multiple
> instances.
> However I have an idea or two on the back-burner for a future release. I
> want to get IDE stable and most bugs out before I start requests such as
> multiple Code Editors, plugins and custom controls. Release 0.19.0
> (coming
> next after the 0.18.n series of bug fixes) will concentrate on improving
> IDE
> internally, overhaul IDE.htm and set up some new routines which will
> pave
> the way for Code Editor enhancements.
That is fine, I saw the way it is set up, and I can wait...
But not too long!
>
> The error messages from getOpenFileName and getSaveFileName come from
> win32lib routines. I notice there is an offering in Recent Contributions
> that will help with getSaveFileName. Can anyone work up getOpenFileName
> to
> supply the ext from FileTypes if user does not enter the ext?
If IDE doesn't find the ext, then couldn't it just append the default?
>
> I'm unclear which files you want highlighted. If you mean non
> Win32lib/Euphoria files then they are Euphoria and Win32lib highlighted
> already. Those added to the project also have their global routines
> highlighted. Some of the support files that come in the Win32lib package
> are
> not currently highlighted. You can run winlibscan.exw in the IDE
> distribution and indicate all the win32lib associated files you want
> syntax
> colored. This program is useful also when changing to newer versions of
> win32lib to update the syntax list for new routine names.
>
I mean if I wanted hilighting on a file named file.other_ext
then there would be a checkbox to enable hilighting on all files,
regardless of extension.
> I've fixed the problem with UnDo and will be distributing IDE 0.18.6p in
> a
> few days.
>
Thanks.
> I will make the other changes you have requested for 0.18.6p.
>
Thanksa gain.
> Thanks for reporting these problems.
>
> Since 0.19.0 may take longer than the normal 2-3 month turn-around,
> expect
> several updates within a week or two time frame until all reported bugs
> (that I know how to fix) are removed. After that time it may be 4-6
> months
> before 0.19.0 is available.
> ~judith
>
> CoJaBo wrote:
> Also, if I put my computer in standby mode or logoff, I get a zillion
> warning messages.
> Adding:
> setWarning(0)
> somewere in IDE should correct this, the warnings are harmless, but
> annoying.
>
Will this be done?
> Also, it would be nice to be able to have more than one code editor open
> in IDE, but that can be done later.
>
> In IDE:
> If you type in the project name without ".prj" it displays an error, I
> don't see why it couldn't just add ".prj" to the end of the name.
>
> In Editor.exw:
> There should be an option to enable hilighting for all files, not just
> the defaults.
>
> I think this (about control+right-click) should be added to the hint
> text
> when you point to
> the layers tabs, it doesn't say that there.
>
>
7. RE: Bugs in latest IDE (0.18.6o)
It was gone by the time I was back online.
Couldn't you just tell me what the error message said instead of making a
screen shot?
~judith
CoJaBo wrote:
The error I get is:
http://64.78.109.121:123/IDE_err.jpg
(hope that link works!) It will only be active for a few hours!
8. RE: Bugs in latest IDE (0.18.6o)
Never mind I see that Brian included it in his message.
~judith
>It was gone by the time I was back online.
>Couldn't you just tell me what the error message said instead of making a
>screen shot?
>~judith
>>CoJaBo wrote:
>>The error I get is:
>>http://64.78.109.121:123/IDE_err.jpg
>>(hope that link works!) It will only be active for a few hours!
9. RE: Bugs in latest IDE (0.18.6o)
My computer was attacked fifty-some times from somwere in Japan untill
my server crashed...
Judith wrote:
>
>
> Never mind I see that Brian included it in his message.
> ~judith
>
> >It was gone by the time I was back online.
>
> >Couldn't you just tell me what the error message said instead of making
> >a
> >screen shot?
> >~judith
>
>
> >>CoJaBo wrote:
> >>The error I get is:
> >>http://64.78.109.121:123/IDE_err.jpg
> >>(hope that link works!) It will only be active for a few hours!
>
