1. Code to optimize.
- Posted by Lucius Hilley <lhilley at CDC.NET> Jan 01, 1999
- 380 views
Here is a small chunk a code to be optimized. Anyone care to scrutinize(sp) its ineffeciency?(sp) I am well aware that this code has a lot of speed to be gained. I just haven't taken the time to tweak it. I fill this would be a good simple challange. HAVE FUN./Happy New Year. 8^) temp = {} cnt = 0 while lm > cnt do cnt = cnt + lr temp = temp & r end while temp = temp[1..lm] _________________________ Lucius L. Hilley III lhilley at cdc.net http://www.cdc.net/~lhilley http://www.dragonvet.com _________________________ <IMG SRC="http://www.cdc.net/~ceace/images/lu4.jpg">
2. Re: Code to optimize.
- Posted by JJProg at CYBERBURY.NET Jan 01, 1999
- 374 views
EU> Here is a small chunk a code to be optimized. EU>Anyone care to scrutinize(sp) its ineffeciency?(sp) EU>I am well aware that this code has a lot of speed to be gained. EU>I just haven't taken the time to tweak it. I fill this would be a EU>good simple challange. HAVE FUN./Happy New Year. 8^) EU> temp = {} EU> cnt = 0 EU> while lm > cnt do EU> cnt = cnt + lr EU> temp = temp & r EU> end while EU> temp = temp[1..lm] What are lm, lr, and r? If r is just an atom, this would work much faster: temp = repeat(r,lm) EU>_________________________ EU>Lucius L. Hilley III lhilley at cdc.net EU>http://www.cdc.net/~lhilley EU>http://www.dragonvet.com EU>_________________________ EU><IMG SRC="http://www.cdc.net/~ceace/images/lu4.jpg"> Jeffrey Fielding JJProg at cyberbury.net http://members.tripod.com/~JJProg/
3. Re: Code to optimize.
- Posted by Lucius Hilley III <lhilley at CDC.NET> Jan 01, 1999
- 367 views
- Last edited Jan 02, 1999
>What are lm, lr, and r? If r is just an atom, this would work much >faster: > >temp = repeat(r,lm) Well taken. I'm am seasoned in Euphoria. I already know that. Simply and Humbly I must say. I completely failed to specify what type of data each value is suppose to hold. I literally YANKED the code directly from the program with out including my declaration of the variables. integer lm, lr, cnt sequence temp, r, my_seq r = rand(repeat(255, rand(35)) my_seq = rand(repeat(255, rand(35)) lr = length(r) lm = length(my_seq) --lr maybe larger or smaller than lm temp = {} cnt = 0 while lm > cnt do cnt = cnt + lr temp = temp & r end while temp = temp[1..lm] _________________________ Lucius L. Hilley III lhilley at cdc.net http://www.cdc.net/~lhilley http://www.dragonvet.com _________________________ <IMG SRC="http://www.cdc.net/~ceace/images/lu4.jpg"> _________________________ On Fri, 1 Jan 1999 14:43:14 EST, JJProg at CYBERBURY.NET wrote: >EU> Here is a small chunk a code to be optimized. >EU>Anyone care to scrutinize(sp) its ineffeciency?(sp) >EU>I am well aware that this code has a lot of speed to be gained. >EU>I just haven't taken the time to tweak it. I fill this would be a >EU>good simple challange. HAVE FUN./Happy New Year. 8^) > > >EU> temp = {} >EU> cnt = 0 >EU> while lm > cnt do >EU> cnt = cnt + lr >EU> temp = temp & r >EU> end while >EU> temp = temp[1..lm] > >What are lm, lr, and r? If r is just an atom, this would work much >faster: > >temp = repeat(r,lm) > <SNIP> of my old Signature. > >Jeffrey Fielding >JJProg at cyberbury.net >http://members.tripod.com/~JJProg/