1. Code to optimize.
Here is a small chunk a code to be optimized.
Anyone care to scrutinize(sp) its ineffeciency?(sp)
I am well aware that this code has a lot of speed to be gained.
I just haven't taken the time to tweak it. I fill this would be a
good simple challange. HAVE FUN./Happy New Year. 8^)
temp = {}
cnt = 0
while lm > cnt do
cnt = cnt + lr
temp = temp & r
end while
temp = temp[1..lm]
_________________________
Lucius L. Hilley III lhilley at cdc.net
http://www.cdc.net/~lhilley
http://www.dragonvet.com
_________________________
<IMG SRC="http://www.cdc.net/~ceace/images/lu4.jpg">
2. Re: Code to optimize.
- Posted by JJProg at CYBERBURY.NET
Jan 01, 1999
EU> Here is a small chunk a code to be optimized.
EU>Anyone care to scrutinize(sp) its ineffeciency?(sp)
EU>I am well aware that this code has a lot of speed to be gained.
EU>I just haven't taken the time to tweak it. I fill this would be a
EU>good simple challange. HAVE FUN./Happy New Year. 8^)
EU> temp = {}
EU> cnt = 0
EU> while lm > cnt do
EU> cnt = cnt + lr
EU> temp = temp & r
EU> end while
EU> temp = temp[1..lm]
What are lm, lr, and r? If r is just an atom, this would work much
faster:
temp = repeat(r,lm)
EU>_________________________
EU>Lucius L. Hilley III lhilley at cdc.net
EU>http://www.cdc.net/~lhilley
EU>http://www.dragonvet.com
EU>_________________________
EU><IMG SRC="http://www.cdc.net/~ceace/images/lu4.jpg">
Jeffrey Fielding
JJProg at cyberbury.net
http://members.tripod.com/~JJProg/
3. Re: Code to optimize.
- Posted by Lucius Hilley III <lhilley at CDC.NET>
Jan 01, 1999
-
Last edited Jan 02, 1999
>What are lm, lr, and r? If r is just an atom, this would work much
>faster:
>
>temp = repeat(r,lm)
Well taken. I'm am seasoned in Euphoria. I already know
that. Simply and Humbly I must say. I completely failed to
specify what type of data each value is suppose to hold.
I literally YANKED the code directly from the program with out
including my declaration of the variables.
integer lm, lr, cnt
sequence temp, r, my_seq
r = rand(repeat(255, rand(35))
my_seq = rand(repeat(255, rand(35))
lr = length(r)
lm = length(my_seq)
--lr maybe larger or smaller than lm
temp = {}
cnt = 0
while lm > cnt do
cnt = cnt + lr
temp = temp & r
end while
temp = temp[1..lm]
_________________________
Lucius L. Hilley III lhilley at cdc.net
http://www.cdc.net/~lhilley
http://www.dragonvet.com
_________________________
<IMG SRC="http://www.cdc.net/~ceace/images/lu4.jpg">
_________________________
On Fri, 1 Jan 1999 14:43:14 EST, JJProg at CYBERBURY.NET wrote:
>EU> Here is a small chunk a code to be optimized.
>EU>Anyone care to scrutinize(sp) its ineffeciency?(sp)
>EU>I am well aware that this code has a lot of speed to be gained.
>EU>I just haven't taken the time to tweak it. I fill this would be a
>EU>good simple challange. HAVE FUN./Happy New Year. 8^)
>
>
>EU> temp = {}
>EU> cnt = 0
>EU> while lm > cnt do
>EU> cnt = cnt + lr
>EU> temp = temp & r
>EU> end while
>EU> temp = temp[1..lm]
>
>What are lm, lr, and r? If r is just an atom, this would work much
>faster:
>
>temp = repeat(r,lm)
>
<SNIP> of my old Signature.
>
>Jeffrey Fielding
>JJProg at cyberbury.net
>http://members.tripod.com/~JJProg/
