1. Set of functions

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_005E_01C11F81.26253760
	charset="iso-8859-1"

I don't know why this message that appeared as "sent" in my computer didn't
appear in the Euphoria list, so I am resending it:

Rob:
I am contributing the attached set of routines to the Recent Users
Contributions as Public Domain.
Please contact me if some other data is needed to that end.
Regards.



------=_NextPart_000_005E_01C11F81.26253760
Content-Type: application/octet-stream;
	name="Aplfunc.zip"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64

new topic     » topic index » view message » categorize

2. Re: Set of functions

Hi Ricardo,

> I am contributing the attached set of routines 
> to the Recent Users Contributions as Public Domain.

The very good and useful work, I think.
Any programming language has own powerful
functions. Old programming languages was
written by the most clever people, same
APL. If Eu has libraries with analogous 
functions, then Eu is the real universal
programming language for the best taste.

Thanks !

Regards,
Igor Kachan
kinz at peterlink.ru

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view message » categorize

3. Set of functions

Rob:
I'd suggest that you have a look to the GradeUp function in my file. I think
you may find some useful ideas.
Thanks.

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view message » categorize

4. Re: Set of functions

rforno writes:
> Rob:
> I'd suggest that you have a look to the GradeUp 
> function in my file. I think you may find some useful ideas.

Yes, I used to program in APL quite a bit, and 
GradeUp and GradeDown were quite useful.
Thanks, I'll consider adding GradeUp in some form,
perhaps with a different name, to sort.e. 
GradeDown could be achieved fairly quickly using reverse().

Regards,
   Rob Craig
   Rapid Deployment Software
   http://www.RapidEuphoria.com

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view message » categorize

5. Re: Set of functions

Rob:
Please see the comment in GradeDown. While 'reverse' after GradeUp results
in the same sequence that GradeDown, this is true only if you get the sorted
*data*. In the case you are getting the indexes of the data and some
elements are equal, the two outputs differ.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Craig" <rds at RapidEuphoria.com>
To: "EUforum" <EUforum at topica.com>
Subject: Re: Set of functions


>
> rforno writes:
> > Rob:
> > I'd suggest that you have a look to the GradeUp
> > function in my file. I think you may find some useful ideas.
>
> Yes, I used to program in APL quite a bit, and
> GradeUp and GradeDown were quite useful.
> Thanks, I'll consider adding GradeUp in some form,
> perhaps with a different name, to sort.e.
> GradeDown could be achieved fairly quickly using reverse().
>
> Regards,
>    Rob Craig
>    Rapid Deployment Software
>    http://www.RapidEuphoria.com
>
>
>
>
>

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view message » categorize

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu