1. Set of functions
- Posted by rforno at tutopia.com Aug 07, 2001
- 451 views
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_005E_01C11F81.26253760 charset="iso-8859-1" I don't know why this message that appeared as "sent" in my computer didn't appear in the Euphoria list, so I am resending it: Rob: I am contributing the attached set of routines to the Recent Users Contributions as Public Domain. Please contact me if some other data is needed to that end. Regards. ------=_NextPart_000_005E_01C11F81.26253760 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="Aplfunc.zip" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
2. Re: Set of functions
- Posted by Igor Kachan <kinz at peterlink.ru> Aug 08, 2001
- 446 views
Hi Ricardo, > I am contributing the attached set of routines > to the Recent Users Contributions as Public Domain. The very good and useful work, I think. Any programming language has own powerful functions. Old programming languages was written by the most clever people, same APL. If Eu has libraries with analogous functions, then Eu is the real universal programming language for the best taste. Thanks ! Regards, Igor Kachan kinz at peterlink.ru
3. Set of functions
- Posted by rforno at tutopia.com Aug 10, 2001
- 466 views
Rob: I'd suggest that you have a look to the GradeUp function in my file. I think you may find some useful ideas. Thanks.
4. Re: Set of functions
- Posted by Robert Craig <rds at RapidEuphoria.com> Aug 10, 2001
- 461 views
rforno writes: > Rob: > I'd suggest that you have a look to the GradeUp > function in my file. I think you may find some useful ideas. Yes, I used to program in APL quite a bit, and GradeUp and GradeDown were quite useful. Thanks, I'll consider adding GradeUp in some form, perhaps with a different name, to sort.e. GradeDown could be achieved fairly quickly using reverse(). Regards, Rob Craig Rapid Deployment Software http://www.RapidEuphoria.com
5. Re: Set of functions
- Posted by rforno at tutopia.com Aug 11, 2001
- 466 views
Rob: Please see the comment in GradeDown. While 'reverse' after GradeUp results in the same sequence that GradeDown, this is true only if you get the sorted *data*. In the case you are getting the indexes of the data and some elements are equal, the two outputs differ. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Robert Craig" <rds at RapidEuphoria.com> To: "EUforum" <EUforum at topica.com> Subject: Re: Set of functions > > rforno writes: > > Rob: > > I'd suggest that you have a look to the GradeUp > > function in my file. I think you may find some useful ideas. > > Yes, I used to program in APL quite a bit, and > GradeUp and GradeDown were quite useful. > Thanks, I'll consider adding GradeUp in some form, > perhaps with a different name, to sort.e. > GradeDown could be achieved fairly quickly using reverse(). > > Regards, > Rob Craig > Rapid Deployment Software > http://www.RapidEuphoria.com > > > > >