1. Ping Rob - Go on then

DQpJIGtub3cgeW91IGtub3csDQoNCkkga25vdyB5b3UncmUgZHlpbmcgdG8gdGVsbCwNCg0KZ28g
b24gdGhlbiwNCg0KaG93IG1hbnkgc2lldmVzIG9uIHRoZSBuZXcgcDQ/DQoNCg0K

new topic     » topic index » view message » categorize

2. Re: Ping Rob - Go on then

Pete Lomax writes:
> I know you know,
> I know you're dying to tell,
> go on then,
> how many sieves on the new p4?

I found it's not that easy to get a consistent time 
on XP, but here goes:

On my new P4 1.8 GHz, 512K cache machine
interpreted sieve using ex: 29819.5
Translated sieve with Watcom: 92726.7

On my older 350 MHz, 512K cache machine I get:
interpreted sieve using ex: 6006.7 
Translated sieve with Watcom: 21229.2

interpreted P4 is faster by 4.96x
translated/compiled, P4 is faster by 4.37x

1800/350 = 5.14x

so the P4 is not living up to what you'd expect
based on MHz alone. I suppose there could be
some cache misses and the cache memory is not 5x faster.

Regards,
   Rob Craig
   Rapid Deployment Software
   http://www.RapidEuphoria.com

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view message » categorize

3. Re: Ping Rob - Go on then

DQpTaHVja3MuIGJldHdlZW4gNC4zNyBhbmQgNC45NnggZmFzdGVyLCBub3QgNS4xNHgNCg0KQmV0
IHlvdSdyZSBndXR0ZWQuDQoNCg==

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view message » categorize

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu