1. File extension suggestion
- Posted by "Boehme, Gabriel" <gboehme at POSTOFFICE.MUSICLAND.COM> Oct 22, 1999
- 561 views
Just an idea that came to my mind: with all this impending multi-platform support for Euphoria, perhaps we ought to modify the way we use extensions. Here are the changes I think would make the most sense: *.ex, *.e = Euphoria files which can be run on ANY platform without modification *.exd. *.ed = Euphoria files which specifically run under MS-DOS This way, we would have dedicated extensions for both platform-specific and platform-independent Euphoria programs. (I suppose, to be consistent, we'd want EX.EXE to become EXD.EXE as well, so that the platform executable corresponds to its platform-dependent file extension.) Anyway, it's just a thought; perhaps this is more of a long-term future idea, when Macintosh and/or BeOS ports are closer to reality. Hep yadda, Gabriel Boehme ---------- The science is in knowing, the art is in perceiving. Robert Fripp ----------
2. Re: File extension suggestion
- Posted by Talvitie <smtoa at SAUNALAHTI.FI> Oct 27, 1999
- 565 views
I think this is a really good idea! --Talvitie -----Alkuper=E4inen viesti----- L=E4hett=E4j=E4: Boehme, Gabriel <gboehme at POSTOFFICE.MUSICLAND.COM> Vastaanottaja: EUPHORIA at LISTSERV.MUOHIO.EDU = <EUPHORIA at LISTSERV.MUOHIO.EDU> P=E4iv=E4: 23. lokakuuta 1999 2:35 Aihe: File extension suggestion >Just an idea that came to my mind: with all this impending = multi-platform >support for Euphoria, perhaps we ought to modify the way we use = extensions. >Here are the changes I think would make the most sense: > >*.ex, *.e =3D Euphoria files which can be run on ANY platform without >modification >*.exd. *.ed =3D Euphoria files which specifically run under MS-DOS > >This way, we would have dedicated extensions for both platform-specific = and >platform-independent Euphoria programs. (I suppose, to be consistent, = we'd >want EX.EXE to become EXD.EXE as well, so that the platform executable >corresponds to its platform-dependent file extension.) > >Anyway, it's just a thought; perhaps this is more of a long-term future >idea, when Macintosh and/or BeOS ports are closer to reality. > > >Hep yadda, >Gabriel Boehme > > >---------- >The science is in knowing, the art is in perceiving. > >Robert Fripp >----------
3. Re: File extension suggestion
- Posted by "Boehme, Gabriel" <gboehme at POSTOFFICE.MUSICLAND.COM> Oct 28, 1999
- 542 views
Talvitie wrote: >I think this is a really good idea! Well, that makes at least TWO of us... Oh well, like I said before, this is probably a bit premature. Euphoria = is still primarily DOS/Windows based. The Linux port is coming along, but = it's still a beta. Once Euphoria is truly a multi-platform language, then = perhaps this idea will merit further consideration. Anyway, thanks for the encouragement! Hep yadda, Gabriel Boehme -------- Begin with the possible and move gradually towards the impossible. Robert Fripp -------- -----Alkuper=E4inen viesti----- L=E4hett=E4j=E4: Boehme, Gabriel <gboehme at POSTOFFICE.MUSICLAND.COM> Vastaanottaja: EUPHORIA at LISTSERV.MUOHIO.EDU = <EUPHORIA at LISTSERV.MUOHIO.EDU> P=E4iv=E4: 23. lokakuuta 1999 2:35 Aihe: File extension suggestion >Just an idea that came to my mind: with all this impending = multi-platform >support for Euphoria, perhaps we ought to modify the way we use = extensions. >Here are the changes I think would make the most sense: > >*.ex, *.e =3D Euphoria files which can be run on ANY platform without >modification >*.exd. *.ed =3D Euphoria files which specifically run under MS-DOS > >This way, we would have dedicated extensions for both = platform-specific and >platform-independent Euphoria programs. (I suppose, to be consistent, = we'd >want EX.EXE to become EXD.EXE as well, so that the platform executable >corresponds to its platform-dependent file extension.) > >Anyway, it's just a thought; perhaps this is more of a long-term = future >idea, when Macintosh and/or BeOS ports are closer to reality. > > >Hep yadda, >Gabriel Boehme > > >---------- >The science is in knowing, the art is in perceiving. > >Robert Fripp >----------