1. Propogating Euphoria
- Posted by Lewis Townsend <keroltarr at HOTMAIL.COM> Apr 15, 1999
- 446 views
- Last edited Apr 16, 1999
Hello, I, once again am involved in propogating the use of Euphoria. I have an assignment (in my dpr110 class this time) to do a presentation and paper on a subject that interests me. I, of course, chose Euphoria but it wasn't until today that I realized that I had to do some charts and/or graphs as well. I plan on doing on of speed comparison among several languages including Euphoria but I have to have at least 2 and I can't think of anything else except comparing the learning curve of Eu with other languages. However, learning dificulty is more or less a personal oppinion and since I don't know a lot of lagnuages, I need your help. Please follow the simple directions below and I will be greatly appreciative: Rate the following languages from 1 to 10 by how dificult they were for you to learn. 1 is easy. 10 is hard. Put N/A if you didn't learn one. Send me a mail at "keroltarr at hotmail.com" with this information. Thank you. Name Example -------- ------- Assembly 10 Basic 2 C/C++ 8 COBOL 9 Euphoria 1 Pascal 5 Visual Basic 3 feel free to add to the list if I missed a major one. Also RDS, it's been a while since I read the propaganda included in the Euphoria package. Are the exact specs for speed tests included in them? If not, could you please send me some numbers so I won't have to make up any? TIA all, Lewis Townsend _______________________________________________________________ Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com
2. Re: Propogating Euphoria
- Posted by Robert Craig <rds at ATTCANADA.NET> Apr 15, 1999
- 415 views
Lewis Townsend writes: > Also RDS, it's been a while since I read the propaganda > included in the Euphoria package. Are the exact specs for > speed tests included in them? Thanks for trying to spread the word about Euphoria. In the demo\bench directory there are some benchmark programs written in Euphoria and QBasic. BENCH.DOC summarizes the results. BENCH.DOC also quotes some results against other languages, but the source code in these other languages isn't supplied. Someone once said that there are 3 levels of lies: 1. Lies 2. Damn Lies 3. Benchmarks I think the benchmarks in demo\bench are reasonably fair, but you should always be suspicious of benchmarks created by the proponents of one side in a contest. If you have time, you might want to make up your own benchmarks. As for propaganda, see c.doc (c.htm) and basic.doc (basic.htm). Regards, Rob Craig Rapid Deployment Software http://members.aol.com/FilesEu/
3. Propogating Euphoria
- Posted by Lewis Townsend <keroltarr at HOTMAIL.COM> Apr 19, 1999
- 404 views
- Last edited Apr 20, 1999
Thanks to the following people for helping me with my project: Robert Craig Rod Jackson Irv Mullins Ralf Nieuwenhuijsen Ferlin Scarborough Jay Turley Adam Weeden Since you cared enough to respond to my message I figure you might be interested in my research results. Here are the Averages, the oppinions varried widely but nobody gave Euphoria more than a 2. Here's the stats in order of decreasing difficulty: AVERAGE Languages Dificulty ========= ========= Fortran 8.0 Assembly 7.0 COBOL 7.0 C/C++ 5.0 Pascal 3.8 Basic 2.6 Visual Basic 2.5 Dlephi 2.0 Euphoria 1.4 note: results are rounded to one decimal place for easy reading. Thanks again for all your help Lewis Townsend _______________________________________________________________ Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com
4. Re: Propogating Euphoria
- Posted by Nuno Barros <nuno.barros at IP.PT> Apr 20, 1999
- 404 views
Lewis Townsend wrote: > AVERAGE > Languages Dificulty > ========= ========= > Fortran 8.0 > Assembly 7.0 > COBOL 7.0 > C/C++ 5.0 > Pascal 3.8 > Basic 2.6 > Visual Basic 2.5 > Dlephi 2.0 > Euphoria 1.4 > > note: results are rounded to one decimal place for easy reading. > and about Liberty Basic?for sure 1.1 -- N u n o B a r r o s [ W e b D e s i g n e r ] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- [ m a i l ] nuno.barros at ip.pt [ i c q ] 6 4 4 8 3 8 8 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- [ Webdesign Portfolio ] http://nuno.homepage.nu [ e.topia ] -in construction- http://etopia.homepage.nu [ Chaos Squad ] http://gollop.homepage.nu [ L i m b o ] http://limbo.homepage.nu ----------------------------------------------------------------------
5. Re: Propogating Euphoria
- Posted by Daniel Berstein <daber at PAIR.COM> Apr 20, 1999
- 431 views
> > and about Liberty Basic?for sure 1.1 > If you like 16bit code.
6. Re: Propogating Euphoria
- Posted by Nuno Barros <nuno.barros at IP.PT> Apr 21, 1999
- 424 views
Daniel Berstein wrote: > > > > and about Liberty Basic?for sure 1.1 > > > > If you like 16bit code. wasn't the question about simplicity of coding? ;)I'm well aware of LB limitations... It could be a great language... -- N u n o B a r r o s [ W e b D e s i g n e r ] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- [ m a i l ] nuno.barros at ip.pt [ i c q ] 6 4 4 8 3 8 8 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Webdesign Portfolio http://nuno.homepage.nu e . t o p i a -in construction- http://etopia.homepage.nu C h a o s S q u a d http://gollop.homepage.nu L i m b o http://limbo.homepage.nu ----------------------------------------------------------------------