1. Modularity (was dynamic includes)
- Posted by SR Williamson <sr.williamson at OSHA.GOV> Feb 29, 2000
- 427 views
I don't have an opinion on the dynamic includes discussion (I'm not an advanced enough programmer to imagine using it yet), but I would love to see modularity introduced. When I used Borland C++ Builder, one thing I loved was that I could find plug-in modules of codes (VCL components), stick them in my programs, modify a few properties, and never have to learn or understand how they worked. I'm sure it made the programmers happy, because they usually released a "lite" and a "pro" version, with the lite for free and some bucks for the pro. I paid a price in size for my programs, but they were extremely easy to build that way for standard stuff. OTOH, the things I used them for, mostly, are so absurdly easy to code using win32lib that maybe I wouldn't use them that much in EU. Or maybe there's some hotshot programmer out there who has a great idea for some EU components, but doesn't want to share his code (I dunno why), and so hasn't implemented them. Overall, though, I think modularity is a good thing (in best Martha Stewart voice), despite the penalties.
2. Re: Modularity (was dynamic includes)
- Posted by Ian Smith <whoisian at HOTMAIL.COM> Mar 01, 2000
- 442 views
can you explain that idea a little more please, i might be able to solve your problem. Ian Smith(NoSolution) ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com