1. Re: EUPHORIA Digest - 20 Feb 2000 to 21 Feb 2000 (#2000-53)
- Posted by Steve Mosher <farq at KILN.ISN.NET> Feb 22, 2000
- 552 views
Personally I think it has more to do with extremely complicated, researched and highly convoluted advanced stages of mastery over arbitrarity. =) On Tue, 22 Feb 2000, j77 wrote: > 1600 was a leap year, as is 2000. but 1700, 1800, and 1900 were not leap > years... > i think it has something to do with extra seconds as the earth slows down in > its spin over the centuries... >
