1. to Kat
- Posted by CenSe <cense at MAIL.RU> Feb 04, 2000
- 605 views
- Last edited Feb 05, 2000
Sorry bout the personal email Kat, that was an accident. but the point still remains, your program will not realistically run for long enough to be worried about the time() function messing up on you. CenSe, a member of the ak-software development team http://ak-software.virtualave.net/
2. Re: to Kat
- Posted by Kat <gertie at ZEBRA.NET> Feb 04, 2000
- 608 views
How thankful i am to you for pointing out my mistake. Here i was so delusional, thinking this app that's been running for 2 weeks was actually running, now i know it's been all in my mind. Kat ----- Original Message ----- From: CenSe <cense at MAIL.RU> To: <EUPHORIA at LISTSERV.MUOHIO.EDU> Sent: Friday, February 04, 2000 12:17 PM Subject: to Kat > Sorry bout the personal email Kat, that was an accident. > but the point still remains, your program will not realistically run for long enough to be worried about the time() function messing up on you. > > CenSe, > a member of the > ak-software > development team > > http://ak-software.virtualave.net/ >
3. Re: to Kat
- Posted by Bernie Ryan <bwryan at PCOM.NET> Feb 04, 2000
- 616 views
Kat: Why can't you get time() and then append a number to it that represents the month, day and year. That would be good beyond 24 hours
4. Re: to Kat
- Posted by Kat <gertie at ZEBRA.NET> Feb 04, 2000
- 583 views
----- Original Message ----- From: Bernie Ryan <bwryan at PCOM.NET> To: <EUPHORIA at LISTSERV.MUOHIO.EDU> Sent: Friday, February 04, 2000 1:57 PM Subject: Re: to Kat > Kat: > > Why can't you get time() and then append a number to it that represents > > the month, day and year. That would be good beyond 24 hours > Because then i am useing the month, day and year and don't need a flat timescale like time(). Kat
5. Re: to Kat
- Posted by Lewis Townsend <keroltarr at HOTMAIL.COM> Feb 04, 2000
- 614 views
- Last edited Feb 05, 2000
Hello, Bernie Ryan wrote: >Kat: > > Why can't you get time() and then append a number to it that represents > > the month, day and year. That would be good beyond 24 hours Another option might be simply to check and see if the time() function has reset yet or not. -- Untested code: constant seconds_in_day = 24*60*60 atom start_time, curent_time integer num_of_days num_of_days = 0 start_time = time () while 1 do curent_time = time() if curent_time > start_time then -- Here would be the regular -- subtraction to check the time. else num_of_days += 1 curent_time += (seconds_in_day * num_of_days) -- Here would be the regular --subtraction to check the time. end if end while -- Please excuse any errors. -- End Code later, Lewis Townsend ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com