1. Re[2]: Namespace Proposal
> I think we really need some sort of import mechanism, maybe
> with...without although I'd prefer something that just imports all
> routines from a namespace into the current file (like "import
> <namespace>")
>
> Thomas Parslow (PatRat) ICQ #:26359483
> Rat Software
> http://www.rat-software.com/
> Please leave quoted text in place when replying
for "with...without" read "with...end with" :)
Thomas Parslow (PatRat) ICQ #:26359483
Rat Software
http://www.rat-software.com/
Please leave quoted text in place when replying
2. Re[2]: Namespace Proposal
> I liked Jeff Fieldings idea for a common procedure/function
> library that was brought up months ago.
>
> Is this still on Source-Forge?
>
> Euman
> euman at bellsouth.net
Yep, it's at:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/standardeu/
Thomas Parslow (PatRat) ICQ #:26359483
Rat Software
http://www.rat-software.com/
Please leave quoted text in place when replying
3. Re: Re[2]: Namespace Proposal
On Thursday 28 June 2001 07:02, Thomas Parslow (PatRat) wrote:
> > I liked Jeff Fieldings idea for a common procedure/function
> > library that was brought up months ago.
> >
> > Is this still on Source-Forge?
> >
> > Euman
> > euman at bellsouth.net
>
> Yep, it's at:
> https://sourceforge.net/projects/standardeu/
>
> Thomas Parslow (PatRat) ICQ #:26359483
It doesn't look like much has been done yet, and that's probably a good
thing, considering that version 2.3 will hopefully add a lot of new features.
One of which will no doubt be namespacing, ,which will profoundly
affect how libraries are written and used.
Regards,
Irv
