2. RE: SafePeek ?
Hi Irv,
the alpha is full of unfinished business. Including converting the "_full"
versions. Many of the examples have references to the full versions because
of my debugging efforts. If you are trying to run YOUR programs using the
alpha version you will have to copy any "_full" file to its proper name.
Eg. TK_MEM_FULL.E --> TK_MEM.E etc...
The Alpha was not meant for anybody to try their own code out yet - unless
you were prepared for some hacking as well.
The reports in so far have identified a number of bugs and suggestions. I
am addressing those and will send the next alpha out in about 7 hours from
now (around 8:00 pm Eastern Standard Time - Australia).
By the way, I have a list of individuals whom I alert when a new alpha is
available. If anyone reading this is not on that list but want to join, just
let me know.
-----------
cheers,
Derek Parnell
Senior Design Engineer
Global Technology Australasia Ltd
dparnell at glotec.com.au
---------------------
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Irv Mullins [mailto:irvm at ellijay.com]
> Sent: Friday, 8 June 2001 11:41 AM
> To: EUforum
> Subject: SafePeek ?
>
>
>
>
> I just downloaded Win32Lib 56 Alpha.
> No program will run, claiming that 'SafePeek' is not defined.
> Where is that routine supposed to be? I have safe.e - it's not there.
>
> Regards,
> Irv
>
>
>
>
3. RE: SafePeek ?
Hi Derek,
I apologise for saying "ignore", just I don't know how to say some
spanish expressions in english.
I'll send u the emails again.
Best Regards,
Guillermo Bonvehí
--- Derek Parnell <ddparnell at bigpond.com> wrote:
>
>
> Hey, I didn't get them. I certainly have NOT knowingly ignored
> anyone. Also,
> my work requires me to travel from time-to-time so some replies are
> delayed.
>
> -----------
> cheers,
> Derek Parnell
> Senior Design Engineer
> Global Technology Australasia Ltd
> dparnell at glotec.com.au
