1. RE: .Net & Euphoria Questions/Comments

Euman wrote:
> I had to learn bits and pieces of
>                HTML
>                CSS
>                XML
>                DHTML
>                JavaScript
>                VBScript
>                ASP
>                and am reading currently ADO
> 

what the heck is this? a swiss army knife? :)

> In the process I found this statement made by MS
> 
> With Visual Studio.NET, developers can build Web applications and Web 
> Services
> that render in any browser and on virtually any device. By using the 
> language of
> their choice, developers can leverage their existing investments in 
> skills and
> systems. The result is increased productivity, end-to-end Web 
> development, and a
> shorter time to delivery.

> My question is this:
> Will Euphoria be ready?

if RDS keeps using watcom(or any obsolete compiler for that matter)? 
nope...they're gonna have to find a .Net compiler. might still work in 
XP, though

new topic     » topic index » view message » categorize

2. RE: .Net & Euphoria Questions/Comments

On 3 Jun 2001, at 14:00, sephiroth _ wrote:

> 
> 
> Euman wrote:
> > I had to learn bits and pieces of
> >                HTML
> >                CSS
> >                XML
> >                DHTML
> >                JavaScript
> >                VBScript
> >                ASP
> >                and am reading currently ADO
> > 
> 
> what the heck is this? a swiss army knife? :)
> 
> > In the process I found this statement made by MS
> > 
> > With Visual Studio.NET, developers can build Web applications and Web 
> > Services
> > that render in any browser and on virtually any device. By using the 
> > language of
> > their choice, developers can leverage their existing investments in 
> > skills and
> > systems. The result is increased productivity, end-to-end Web 
> > development, and a
> > shorter time to delivery.
> 
> > My question is this:
> > Will Euphoria be ready?
> 
> if RDS keeps using watcom(or any obsolete compiler for that matter)? 
> nope...they're gonna have to find a .Net compiler. might still work in 
> XP, though

I'll be *very* wary of .net code. 

1) Micro$oft's ownership of their codebase, 
2) and their ability to sue anyone, 
3) plus the court cases that have said if you use someone's puter (and the
codebase)
to send email, they have rights to the email and your footprints.

This is why i will not consider using MS's satalite internet delivery, not just
the
incredibly high cost of the computer, but that it may not be possible to filter
what the
puter sends to MS. Yeas, i block R/ARP broadcasts.

[22:39] *** ChanServ changes topic to ' EARTHLINK USERS: 
http://grc.com/su/earthlink.htm 

14 bits of "not used at this time" ? I bet they won't tell you when they will
use those
bits, or for what, or how they will turn them on in your puter.

Kat

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view message » categorize

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu