1. RE: .Net & Euphoria Questions/Comments
- Posted by sephiroth _ <euman2376 at yahoo.com> Jun 03, 2001
- 402 views
Euman wrote: > I had to learn bits and pieces of > HTML > CSS > XML > DHTML > JavaScript > VBScript > ASP > and am reading currently ADO > what the heck is this? a swiss army knife? :) > In the process I found this statement made by MS > > With Visual Studio.NET, developers can build Web applications and Web > Services > that render in any browser and on virtually any device. By using the > language of > their choice, developers can leverage their existing investments in > skills and > systems. The result is increased productivity, end-to-end Web > development, and a > shorter time to delivery. > My question is this: > Will Euphoria be ready? if RDS keeps using watcom(or any obsolete compiler for that matter)? nope...they're gonna have to find a .Net compiler. might still work in XP, though
2. RE: .Net & Euphoria Questions/Comments
- Posted by gertie at ad-tek.net Jun 03, 2001
- 415 views
On 3 Jun 2001, at 14:00, sephiroth _ wrote: > > > Euman wrote: > > I had to learn bits and pieces of > > HTML > > CSS > > XML > > DHTML > > JavaScript > > VBScript > > ASP > > and am reading currently ADO > > > > what the heck is this? a swiss army knife? :) > > > In the process I found this statement made by MS > > > > With Visual Studio.NET, developers can build Web applications and Web > > Services > > that render in any browser and on virtually any device. By using the > > language of > > their choice, developers can leverage their existing investments in > > skills and > > systems. The result is increased productivity, end-to-end Web > > development, and a > > shorter time to delivery. > > > My question is this: > > Will Euphoria be ready? > > if RDS keeps using watcom(or any obsolete compiler for that matter)? > nope...they're gonna have to find a .Net compiler. might still work in > XP, though I'll be *very* wary of .net code. 1) Micro$oft's ownership of their codebase, 2) and their ability to sue anyone, 3) plus the court cases that have said if you use someone's puter (and the codebase) to send email, they have rights to the email and your footprints. This is why i will not consider using MS's satalite internet delivery, not just the incredibly high cost of the computer, but that it may not be possible to filter what the puter sends to MS. Yeas, i block R/ARP broadcasts. [22:39] *** ChanServ changes topic to ' EARTHLINK USERS: http://grc.com/su/earthlink.htm 14 bits of "not used at this time" ? I bet they won't tell you when they will use those bits, or for what, or how they will turn them on in your puter. Kat