1. RE: more powerful than c++(...able to leap over tall buildings with a ..
Derek Parnell wrote:
> I suspect it comes from the idea that, given a programming project that
> started from scratch (ie. no-code reuse from other projects), one could
> achieve delivery of the product faster with Euphoria than with C++, and
> with fewer bugs.
>
> I don't know of any hard data to support this position, and I'm sure it
> is
> anacedotal. Religious Wars have been started over less 
The definition of "powerful" needs to be defined before anyone can
answer the question.
Personally, I think a better way to describe Euphoria is ...
"easy to learn, easy to use and productive".
... this is true as long as the program you are writing fits into a
subset of projects.
If the program you are writing doesn't fit into the predefined subset
then all anyone can say is .. "it's possible to use Euphoria.".
Regards,
Ray Smith
http://rays-web.com
