1. Re: Qbasic Stuff/Wish List

David Cuny wrote:

>I finally converted my web page generator and sent it off to Robert.

Good. I just started to write my own, now I can relax and play some
bridge instead.


> I've never gotten used to Euphoria sometimes returning a string, and
> sometimes returning a numeric code. It's jarring, and the resulting
> code moves the logic from the top of the 'while' loop and into the
> loop body:
>
>    while 1 do
>
>       o = gets( handle )
>       if integer(o) then
>          exit
>       end if
>
>       ...
>
>    end while


I know, that's how Robert does it in the manual, but the following is
neater and also faster, because it eliminates one of the tests:

    o = gets(handle)
    while sequence(o) do
        ...
        o = gets(handle)
    end while


> I've coded a pair of functions to support the QBasic way of doing
> things:
>
>    while not eof( handle ) do
>       s = line_input( handle )
>    end while
>
> eof() is used to check for an end of file. line_input() is guaranteed
> to return a sequence from the file. If it's the end of the file, it
> returns an empty sequence. It would be nice (for me, anyway) if
> Euphoria's built-in file routines worked with eof(). Robert wouldn't
> need to change their defined behaviors, either - they could still
> return -1 on EOF.

This is not just unnecessarily slow, (for the reason stated above plus
the functions overheads), it's also incorrect, because it generates a
phony line sequence.


> Finally, inspired by Python, left() and right() allow negative
> indexes. So you can write:
>
>    -- return string, less 1 character off right side
>    s = left(s,-1)
>
> instead of:
>
>    s = s[1..length(s)-1)]

Yeah. This is the kind of thing I have been advocating for years.
Python slices have a beautiful logic behind them, but I am afraid it's
too late for us and for Robert to read the book now ...;)


> I know that it might be considered bloat, but it would be Real
> Convenient if Euphoria allowed C++ style comments:
>
>    // like this
>
> in addition to "classic" comments
>
>   -- like this

For heaven's sake, David, why?!

But _block_ comments are are still on my wishlist, though they have
drifted towards the bottom of it now - I created macros in all my
editors to do them with a single keystroke anyway.

jiri

new topic     » topic index » view message » categorize

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu