1. Re: Forum Only (Was Re: Improvement that Everybody Will Agree With:
- Posted by cchris005 at fastmail.fm Jan 13, 2007
- 431 views
[snipped] > > This is yet another argument for the forum style (bangs head on nearest > brick wall). WHO USES OFF LINE READING ANYMORE? Who needs the digest > mailed > to them? How many other languages use the list form, rather than the > forum > form. (I think Chris Bensler has missed a couple of posts because of > Topica lag) > I wish some email digest being available. Unfortunately, only Topica has provided it so far, and it has coughed digests on a irregular basis since Dec 1 or so. RDS? When will you provide this facility (group posts in emails: last 10 (say), or last in the prev 12h (say), whichever takes place first)? I like to look at posts from office. The computers are in a network behind various security filters. As a result, getting individual emails would cause the sender to be blocked as spam. And I don't have any RSS facility - opening the rss link displays an xml file. I think I'm not the only one who consults the posts from work, but donesn't own the computer so as to allow large emmailing or enabling RSS. The web interface is still available. But I have to "next" from one post to the other (takes time), can't glance at a group of posts fast (which I can with digest headers), and it is very difficult to pick up where you left when there's a large amount of posts in a short period of time - and it is precisely in this circumstance that you need to follow stuff closely. > Oh well, soap box rant over. I have the utmost respect for the above > mentioned > developers. But sometimes you're just so ...... pedantic! > I never found a pedantic post here, apart perhaps from a couple of guys never seen since like 3 years. What do you mean? > > > > Do we have anyone in favour of the chk_include then ? > > No, but I would be in favour of an internal version() > Me too. But the function must return something when given a file without the info. > Chris Burch > > ps - does this mean I have to rename some of my own CB_?????() functions? CChris -- cchris005 at fastmail.fm -- http://www.fastmail.fm - Does exactly what it says on the tin