1. RE: Wish: variable_id()
- Posted by Matthew Lewis <matthewwalkerlewis at YAHOO.COM> Dec 31, 2002
- 401 views
You might want to try my modified interpreter (http://www.rapideuphoria.com/exwm.zip), as it does exactly those things you've asked for. Matt Lewis > From: Andy Serpa [mailto:ac at onehorseshy.com] > It has been suggested before to add the ability to > parse/execute strings > as Euphoria code, which would be terrific, but short of that, > how about > variable_id(), which ought to be in the realm of possibility, > plus we've > already got routine_id(), and it is lonely. > > The ability to look up variables by their names ala variable_id("x") > would make it trivial to make a user-created expression evaluator > without all sorts of code for assigning variables. Of course, along > with variable_id() we'd need a couple of extra functions to make > assignments & lookup values via id -- i.e. get_value(v_id) & > assign(v_id, new_value). Or maybe just make available a > special array > of all variables accessible within the current scope as is > done in some > languages. [ i.e. VAR_ARRAY[4] = new_value; > find("x",VAR_ARRAY_NAMES), > etc. ] > > Unlike many suggestions for new features, which are shortcuts > that might > make things easier but don't add new functionality to the > language, this > would open up all sorts of new possibilities that currently > are...well, > not possible.
2. RE: Wish: variable_id()
- Posted by Andy Serpa <ac at onehorseshy.com> Dec 31, 2002
- 394 views
> > You might want to try my modified interpreter > (http://www.rapideuphoria.com/exwm.zip), as it does exactly those things > you've asked for. > I might, but then I might not be able to stop. All of my development eventually goes through the translator and is compiled, so I don't want to get into the habit of using alternate interpreters where I don't have that option. (You can't even bind things, can you?) So maybe we can convince Rob to use your code?