1. RE: ShellExecuteEx question (restated)
- Posted by Al Getz <Xaxo at aol.com> Mar 21, 2001
- 470 views
Hi again, lpcd at CYBER.NET.PK wrote: > shellExecuteEx great and works well. However, it appears to work at its > own > speed and independently of the process which called it. Is there any way > of > having my program wait until the shelled process is complete? > > On a related issue, is there a way of getting hold of the window title > of > every window on the machine, over and above whatever windows my program > has > created? This question derives from wanting to watch for the > disappearance > of the window created by my shell call. > > I'm slowly getting the hand of Win32 programming after years of DOS. > It's > great having the registered version! > > Bruce. > Did you first try using 'system()' and 'system_exec()' built into Euphoria? --Al
2. RE: ShellExecuteEx question (restated)
- Posted by Matthew Lewis <matthewwalkerlewis at YAHOO.COM> Mar 21, 2001
- 432 views
> -----Original Message----- > From: lpcd at CYBER.NET.PK [mailto:lpcd at CYBER.NET.PK] > shellExecuteEx great and works well. However, it appears to > work at its own > speed and independently of the process which called it. Is > there any way of > having my program wait until the shelled process is complete? I thought that this was the original behavior of shellExecute in win32lib, but now I can't figure out how that worked. Does anyone have any records of that thread? I don't think that RDS has the archives of the old listserv up yet, or I'd search that. Matt Lewis