1. rob'e new pages
- Posted by "Cuny, David" <ATB.DCUNY at HW1.CAHWNET.GOV> May 05, 1997
- 940 views
I just saw Rob's new Euphoria pages. The layout is great, but the colors are hideous - bright teal and rose, with pinstripe. They seem to be designed for maximum illegibility... -- David Cuny
2. rob'e new pages
- Posted by Robert Craig <robert_craig at COMPUSERVE.COM> May 05, 1997
- 943 views
David Cuny writes: > I just saw Rob's new Euphoria pages. The layout is great, but the colors are > hideous - bright teal and rose, with pinstripe. They seem to be designed for > maximum illegibility... Junko built the new site. I really like it, although from the color-scheme you can tell that a woman designed it. Seriously though, we had some undesirable "pinstriping" effect that we thought we had gotten rid of, at least for Netscape and MS IE. We found that if you don't choose a good RGB mix for your colors, browsers will show a mix of adjacent colors, depending on what browser options you have set. (I believe "dithering" is the word I'm looking for). What browser are you using, and on what machine, or O/S? How many other people are seeing vertical pinstriping instead of solid background colors? Anyone using the pathetic built-in browser on AOL should set preferences to "uncompressed images". Regards, Rob Craig Rapid Deployment Software
3. Re: rob'e new pages
- Posted by Joseph Martin <jam at EXIS.NET> May 05, 1997
- 919 views
I'll put in my two bits on this... > Seriously though, we had some undesirable "pinstriping" effect > that we thought we had gotten rid of, at least for Netscape > and MS IE. We found that if you don't choose a good RGB mix for your colors, > browsers will show a mix of adjacent colors, depending on what > browser options you have set. > (I believe "dithering" is the word I'm looking for). > > What browser are you using, and on what machine, or O/S? Netscape 3.0; 386SX; Win 3.1 > How many other people are seeing vertical pinstriping instead > of solid background colors? I haven't checked yet, but with my 16 color display I know there'll be dithering and pinstriping. A note to those with pages: Try to use only the basic 16 colors. Not everyone has a display with 16.25 million colors and a lot of color combos are hard to read with 16 colors. ~~>Joseph Martin ~~>E-mail: joe at cyber-wizard.com ~~>URL: http://users.exis.net/~jam/
4. Re: rob'e new pages
- Posted by Architek <architek at GEOCITIES.COM> May 05, 1997
- 921 views
Robert Craig wrote: > How many other people are seeing vertical pinstriping instead > of solid background colors? I don't see printstriping, but the yellow "explosion" on the Euphoria logo (top of the page) is seen dithered, which didn't occur before. My settings: 486dx2/66 8 Ram Win95 Netscape 2.02 Gold 800x600 with 16 bit colors P.D. If you have an Euphoria page, subscribe to the Euphoria Webring at: Bye, -- ************************************ This message sent by Daniel Berstein ************************************ email: architek at geocities.com homepages: http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Heights/9316 http://www.cybercity.hko.net/silicon_valley/architek
5. Re: rob'e new pages
- Posted by Architek <architek at GEOCITIES.COM> May 05, 1997
- 915 views
Robert Craig wrote: > How many other people are seeing vertical pinstriping instead > of solid background colors? I don't see printstriping, but the yellow "explosion" on the Euphoria logo (top of the page) is seen dithered, which didn't occur before. My settings: 486dx2/66 8 Ram Win95 Netscape 2.02 Gold 800x600 with 16 bit colors TO ALL: If you have an Euphoria page, subscribe to the Euphoria Webring at: Bye, -- ************************************ This message sent by Daniel Berstein ************************************ email: architek at geocities.com homepages: http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Heights/9316 http://www.cybercity.hko.net/silicon_valley/architek
6. Re: rob'e new pages
- Posted by Joshua Milligan <silverlaser at HOTMAIL.COM> May 05, 1997
- 911 views
Robert Craig wrote: >What browser are you using, and on what machine, or O/S? Netscape 3.0 for Windows 3.1 >How many other people are seeing vertical pinstriping instead >of solid background colors? I'm not certain I know what pinstriping is, so it's probably not there, but I do think that the purple and hot pink colors are almost hideous, but not to the same extent that others seem to see it. (matter of oppinion or different browsers?--I don't know.) But that brings up something else: I recently created a Euphoria web site at I'm not certain how it looks with other browsers on different machines. So if it looks bad with your browser, please let me know at silverlaser at HoTMail.com and I'll try to fix the problem. (I'm also looking for some more good code to put on the page.) Thanks. Joshua Milligan silverlaser at HoTMail.com --------------------------------------------------------- Get Your *Web-Based* Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com ---------------------------------------------------------
7. Re: rob'e new pages
- Posted by "Cuny, David" <ATB.DCUNY at HW1.CAHWNET.GOV> May 05, 1997
- 918 views
Rob Craig replied: > Seriously though, we had some undesirable "pinstriping" effect > that we thought we had gotten rid of, at least for Netscape > and MS IE. It was fixed this morning. I e-mailed the comment Friday at 5:00. I don't know why my e-mail is so sloooow... The layout is much nicer than the old version. -- David Cuny
8. Re: rob'e new pages
- Posted by Mike Burrell <Mike.Burrell at GEOCITIES.COM> May 05, 1997
- 918 views
> What browser are you using, and on what machine, or O/S? netscape navigator pre-release 4 dual processor pentium pro 200 96 mb ram win nt 4 1280x1024 @ 16.7 million i dunno it looks fine to me (altho looking over my system specs i'm not surprised...heh) altho i must say i have a certain loathing of hot pink and purple . o O Mike Burrell O o . . o O http://www.geocities.com/SoHo/9036 O o . . o O burrellm at geocities.com O o .
9. Re: rob'e new pages
- Posted by "mrunner at webaccess.net" <mrunner at WEBACCESS.NET> May 05, 1997
- 913 views
- Last edited May 06, 1997
Architek wrote: > I don't see printstriping, but the yellow "explosion" on the > Euphoria logo (top of the page) is seen dithered, which didn't occur > before. That is because the Euphoria logo has transparent codes in it, so the purple and pink of the background bleeds through. You couldn't see this on the old pages because the background was white, and blended well with the explosion. Notice how on the purple side of the stripe, the color that bleeds through the explosion is purple, and on the pink side, pink bleeds through. even that little dark line is visible through the explosion. I still think those animated star trek ship things should go. Pardon my lameness - a programmer who's not into sci-fi. seems to be much of a cliche if you ask me.. it's not the ship or what it means - it's the fact that not everybody views Windows in 1024x768 graphics mode.. If you scroll the page to the right far enough, you can see the background stripe begin again (my guess is that the background was drawn at 800x600 and the animated star trek ship is drawn in 1024x768) btw - i'm viewing the page in 640x480 mode. Lastly - Pink/Purple are not my favorite colors. ;) If you want people to read the information on the pages, you should not give them headaches, unless your ultimate goal in life is to give people headaches. Colors easy on the eyes should be used for the background. Other than that, the page layout is very good. Just some constructive criticism from a fellow HTML designer.. Hope this helps. -- - MiD ( mrunner at webaccess.net ) HTML designer extraordinaire