1. Matt - the C++ magic
- Posted by Jonas Temple <jtemple at yhti.net>
Oct 11, 2006
-
Last edited Oct 12, 2006
Matt,
Would it be within the realm of possibilities to somehow extract the code you
created to call C++ objects and make it a seperate include file? I've got some
C++ stuff that I'd like to interface to but IIRC, there's a piece in the wxeu.dll
that is required.
So..how about it?
Jonas Temple
http://www.yhti.net/~jktemple
2. Re: Matt - the C++ magic
- Posted by Matt Lewis <matthewwalkerlewis at gmail.com>
Oct 11, 2006
-
Last edited Oct 12, 2006
Jonas Temple wrote:
>
> Matt,
>
> Would it be within the realm of possibilities to somehow extract the code you
> created to call C++ objects and make it a seperate include file? I've got
> some
> C++ stuff that I'd like to interface to but IIRC, there's a piece in the
> wxeu.dll
> that is required.
>
> So..how about it?
The magic you need can be found at:
http://www.rapideuphoria.com/fptr.zip
This file is what I use for eucom. COM objects are really just C++
objects that follow certain conventions.
The hard part is dealing with the name decoration. And if your C++ is
built using MSVC, it's probably using a slightly different calling
convention, where the 'this' pointer is passed in ecx, rather than
on the stack.
Matt Lewis
3. Re: Matt - the C++ magic
Speaking of COM, do you ever anticipate coming out with an update to EuCOM?
Jonas Temple
http://www.yhti.net/~jktemple
4. Re: Matt - the C++ magic
Jonas Temple wrote:
>
> Speaking of COM, do you ever anticipate coming out with an update to EuCOM?
>
I haven't really used it for a while. Is there something in particular
that you're interested in?
Matt Lewis
5. Re: Matt - the C++ magic
Matt Lewis wrote:
> I haven't really used it for a while. Is there something in particular
> that you're interested in?
Well, I think I just found it. My biggest problem with EuCOM before was the
difference between COM examples I'd find and how to translate the code into EuCom
syntax.
But I see that you've combined EuCOM with your OOEU and that to me more closely
resemble conventional COM/VB examples. I just downloaded your OOEU and I'm going
to see if that helps.
Thanks,
Jonas Temple
http://www.yhti.net/~jktemple
