1. threads.. euman?
- Posted by gertie at ad-tek.net Jul 04, 2001
- 361 views
On 4 Jul 2001, at 2:46, euman at bellsouth.net wrote: > > I dont think that is possible unless you were to setup > a SystemThread responder. Euman, can you make any sense out of: http://www.mathcs.sjsu.edu/faculty/pearce/mfc/chp5/chapter5.htm and better yet, can you make threads in Eu yet? Kat, with fingers crossed.
2. Re: threads.. euman?
- Posted by euman at bellsouth.net Jul 04, 2001
- 363 views
No Kat, I havent done this *YET but looking at the SDK I think I'll give it a shot sometime this week after I finish something for PATRAT and a website Im commited to. Im almost finished with it (Thank goodness). I breifly looked at what it might take to do it and made about 10 minutes worth of evaluation. Here's what I see at this point.....maybe it'll give someone an idea >? this should be the same as calling ThreadProc id = routine_id("WndProc") thread1 = routine_id("Thread1") thread2 = routine_id("Thread2") -- get 32-bit address for callback WndProcAddress = call_back(id) Thread1ProcAddress = call_back(thread1) Thread2ProcAddress = call_back(thread2) then: CreateThread(NULL, 0, -- 1 meg stack Thread1, 1, 0, 1) now your procedure or function that is named Thread1 should be setup to do just about anything. I might mention that the stack being 1 meg default Im concerned about memory leaks and the likes but we could work those out. This isnt going to be something for the timid at heart cause it can really mess a machine up. Wish me luck! Euman euman at bellsouth.net ----- Original Message ----- From: <gertie at ad-tek.net> To: "EUforum" <EUforum at topica.com> Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2001 20:31 Subject: threads.. euman? > > > On 4 Jul 2001, at 2:46, euman at bellsouth.net wrote: > > > > > > I dont think that is possible unless you were to setup > > a SystemThread responder. > > Euman, can you make any sense out of: > http://www.mathcs.sjsu.edu/faculty/pearce/mfc/chp5/chapter5.htm > > and better yet, can you make threads in Eu yet? > > Kat, > with fingers crossed. > > > >