1. RE: datetime.e
- Posted by sephiroth _ <euman2376 at yahoo.com> Jul 03, 2001
- 382 views
i just tried a little program in C. here's the source: #include <time.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <stdio.h> int main (int argc,char **argv) { struct tm *t; long thetime; if (argc==1) return 0; thetime=strtoul(argv[1],'\0',10); t=localtime(&thetime); printf("%d/%d/%d %d:%02d:%02d\n",t->tm_mon+1,t->tm_mday,t->tm_year, t->tm_hour,t->tm_min,t->tm_sec); return 0; } oddly enough, when you run it with the argument 0, it prints "1/1/1969 19:00:00". call me crazy, but doesn't that sound like new year's day 1969, 9 PM? either something is wrong with my linux box, or something is wrong with the docs where you got the exact date of the epoch euphoria at carlw.legend.uk.com wrote: > sephiroth _ wrote: > Odd. Is it the same number of _seconds_ that it is incorrect by each > time or > does it vary? It may well be that I've misjudged where the 1970 epoch > lies - > I use 1970-1-1 0:00:00am - can someone confirm or deny this is the right > date/time?
2. RE: datetime.e
- Posted by sephiroth _ <euman2376 at yahoo.com> Jul 03, 2001
- 373 views
tiny correction, it really prints 12/31/1969. and it does the same thing in windows, too
3. RE: datetime.e
- Posted by freeplay at mailandnews.com Jul 04, 2001
- 376 views
>===== Original Message From sephiroth _ <euman2376 at yahoo.com> ===== > >i just tried a little program in C. here's the source: > >#include <time.h> >#include <stdlib.h> >#include <stdio.h> > >int main (int argc,char **argv) { > struct tm *t; > long thetime; > if (argc==1) return 0; > thetime=strtoul(argv[1],'\0',10); > t=localtime(&thetime); > printf("%d/%d/%d %d:%02d:%02d\n",t->tm_mon+1,t->tm_mday,t->tm_year, > t->tm_hour,t->tm_min,t->tm_sec); > return 0; >} > >oddly enough, when you run it with the argument 0, it prints "1/1/1969 >19:00:00". call me crazy, but doesn't that sound like new year's day >1969, 9 PM? either something is wrong with my linux box, or something is >wrong with the docs where you got the exact date of the epoch Hi, I compiled up this C program on HP-UX 10.20 and ran it with an argument of 0 and got: 1/1/70 0:00:00 But they I did this: TZ=EST5 export TZ and re-ran the program and got: 12/31/69 19:00:00 I then tried: TZ=PDT7 export TZ and got: 12/31/69 17:00:00 Finally setting back to: TZ=GMT0 export TZ gives: 1/1/70 0:00:00 so the C program is getting the localtime by using the TZ (time zone) environment variable - does this explain the anomoly? Can you try a similar test on Windows? Regards, FP.
4. RE: datetime.e
- Posted by sephiroth _ <euman2376 at yahoo.com> Jul 04, 2001
- 394 views
it could be added to windows and linux, but in DOS it's completely oblivious to time zones. the only kind of time correction it uses is daylight savings time. oh well...nobody really uses DOS anymore anyway :) well, i do, but i guess if robert does add this stuff i'll be using that slow windows console a lot more ;) euphoria at carlw.legend.uk.com wrote: > The downside is that there's no built-in facility for getting the > current > timezone and daylight savings in Euphoria, so I can't add features to > the > library to support it. :(