1. Matt and EuCom
Matt,
Thanks for taking a look at my namespace issues.
I started another post because I felt like it was time for a "hats off"
to your efforts with EuCom.
I'm just scratching the surface on a product that I hope one day might
become a commercial package. My first step was to use some COM/ActiveX
objects to interface with another program. I used Matts's TBrowse and
created 8-10 wrappers for various objects. I included all the wrappers,
wrote a small test program and it worked WITHOUT ANY modifications to the
generated COM wrapper files! Excellent work, Matt!
One small question. With the new version of EuCom is it necessary to
regenerate COM wrappers via TBrowse?
Jonas Temple
http://www.yhti.net/~jktemple
2. Re: Matt and EuCom
Jonas Temple wrote:
>
> Matt,
>
> Thanks for taking a look at my namespace issues.
>
> I started another post because I felt like it was time for a "hats off"
> to your efforts with EuCom.
>
> I'm just scratching the surface on a product that I hope one day might
> become a commercial package. My first step was to use some COM/ActiveX
> objects to interface with another program. I used Matts's TBrowse and
> created 8-10 wrappers for various objects. I included all the wrappers,
> wrote a small test program and it worked WITHOUT ANY modifications to the
> generated COM wrapper files! Excellent work, Matt!
Thanks!
> One small question. With the new version of EuCom is it necessary to
> regenerate COM wrappers via TBrowse?
No (unless the old wrappers resulted in the namespace issues that
I've fixed in later versions).
Matt Lewis
