1. Contest Update (18-Nov-2004)
- Posted by Derek Parnell <ddparnell at bigpond.com>
Nov 18, 2004
-
Last edited Nov 19, 2004
Who would have believed that Jiri could shave any more off, but he
managed to. But it's Pete Lomax that has broken the 9-second barrier.
http://www.users.bigpond.com/ddparnell/contest1/rules.htm
--
Derek Parnell
Melbourne, Australia
2. Re: Contest Update (18-Nov-2004)
- Posted by Jason Gade <jaygade at yahoo.com>
Nov 18, 2004
-
Last edited Nov 19, 2004
Awesome! I finally got my code (mostly) correct. I wonder what I'm still doing
wrong on the dictionary... Hmm.
Well, I started revising again before my last submission's paint had dried, so I
think I will submit one more. Once I've tested and debugged it, that is.
j.
3. Re: Contest Update (18-Nov-2004)
- Posted by Derek Parnell <ddparnell at bigpond.com>
Nov 18, 2004
-
Last edited Nov 19, 2004
Jason Gade wrote:
>
> Awesome! I finally got my code (mostly) correct. I wonder what I'm still
> doing wrong
> on the dictionary... Hmm.
> Well, I started revising again before my last submission's paint had dried, so
> I think
> I will submit one more. Once I've tested and debugged it, that is.
I suspect you are not correctly dealing with top frequence tokens that
have the same frequence count . This is what your program gives ...
01 WORLDS 2
02 ZYMURGY 1
and this is what it should give...
01 ANIMALS 2
02 APPLICATIONS 2
03 AUTHORS 2
04 BANKS 2
05 BASICS 2
06 BOARDS 2
07 CALCULATORS 2
08 CALLERS 2
09 CANT 2
10 CATS 2
11 CHARACTERS 2
12 CHIPS 2
13 COMPILERS 2
14 COMPUTERS 2
15 COOKIES 2
16 DART 2
17 DAYS 2
18 DEFINES 2
19 DESKTOPS 2
20 DISKETTES 2
--
Derek Parnell
Melbourne, Australia
4. Re: Contest Update (18-Nov-2004)
- Posted by Jason Gade <jaygade at yahoo.com>
Nov 18, 2004
-
Last edited Nov 19, 2004
Derek Parnell wrote:
>
> Jason Gade wrote:
> >
> > Awesome! I finally got my code (mostly) correct. I wonder what I'm still
> > doing wrong
> > on the dictionary... Hmm.
> > Well, I started revising again before my last submission's paint had dried,
> > so I think
> > I will submit one more. Once I've tested and debugged it, that is.
>
> I suspect you are not correctly dealing with top frequence tokens that
> have the same frequence count . This is what your program gives ...
>
> 01 WORLDS 2
> 02 ZYMURGY 1
>
> and this is what it should give...
>
> 01 ANIMALS 2
> 02 APPLICATIONS 2
> 03 AUTHORS 2
> 04 BANKS 2
> 05 BASICS 2
> 06 BOARDS 2
> 07 CALCULATORS 2
> 08 CALLERS 2
> 09 CANT 2
> 10 CATS 2
> 11 CHARACTERS 2
> 12 CHIPS 2
> 13 COMPILERS 2
> 14 COMPUTERS 2
> 15 COOKIES 2
> 16 DART 2
> 17 DAYS 2
> 18 DEFINES 2
> 19 DESKTOPS 2
> 20 DISKETTES 2
>
> --
> Derek Parnell
> Melbourne, Australia
>
Oh.
I guess that I have to re-read the rules again. I thought that it wasn't
supposed to print out duplicates, of length frequencies OR of word frequencies.
That's easy to fix. Thanks again!
j.
5. Re: Contest Update (18-Nov-2004)
- Posted by cklester <cklester at yahoo.com>
Nov 18, 2004
-
Last edited Nov 19, 2004
Derek Parnell wrote:
> Who would have believed that Jiri could shave any more off, but he
> managed to. But it's Pete Lomax that has broken the 9-second barrier.
That's just amazing. Way to go Pete! :)
I'm not worthy!!!
-=ck
"Programming in a state of EUPHORIA."
http://www.cklester.com/euphoria/
