1. Contest Update (16 Nov 2004)
Five new submissions.
Note that the 'style' comment "Wrong count fileX." will also be
shown when the order of the top-frequence tokens is incorrect. A
few people are not sorting these correctly.
--
Derek Parnell
Melbourne, Australia
2. Re: Contest Update (16 Nov 2004)
Derek Parnell wrote:
>
> Five new submissions.
>
> Note that the 'style' comment "Wrong count fileX." will also be
> shown when the order of the top-frequence tokens is incorrect. A
> few people are not sorting these correctly.
>
Hmmm... Why was my fifth labeled sixth? And why was it renamed?
None of the other were!
Anyway, I'm third! Yay! Though when Ricardo manages to get his program
to work correctly, I'm fourth again! *sigh*
Regards, Alexander Toresson
Shhh! Be vewy quiet! I'm hunting wuntime ewwows!
3. Re: Contest Update (16 Nov 2004)
- Posted by Derek Parnell <ddparnell at bigpond.com>
Nov 16, 2004
-
Last edited Nov 17, 2004
Alexander Toresson wrote:
>
> Derek Parnell wrote:
> >
> > Five new submissions.
> >
> > Note that the 'style' comment "Wrong count fileX." will also be
> > shown when the order of the top-frequence tokens is incorrect. A
> > few people are not sorting these correctly.
> >
>
> Hmmm... Why was my fifth labeled sixth? And why was it renamed?
> None of the other were!
That would be because I can't count 
Actually, I got your's and Jason Mirwald's mixed up at first and I forgot
to relabel yours back as #5. I'll fix it up tonight.
--
Derek Parnell
Melbourne, Australia
