1. ee.ex
- Posted by Bernie Ryan <bwryan at PCOM.NET> Sep 10, 1999
- 412 views
David In new ee.ex the syntax coloring has been swapped around to different colors. Cut and Paste to Windows Clipboard has been removed. When any entries are updated in ini file anything that is not used in ee.ex is stripped out of ini when you update it ( suppose the user wanted to share the ini file with another program )The user might want to use ini file with windows. Bernie
2. Re: ee.ex
- Posted by David Cuny <dcuny at LANSET.COM> Sep 10, 1999
- 406 views
Bernie Ryan wrote: > In new ee.ex the syntax coloring has been > swapped around to different colors. Don't think so. > Cut and Paste to Windows Clipboard has been > removed. I never coded that feature; you must be using someone else's version. > When any entries are updated in ini file anything that > is not used in ee.ex is stripped out of ini when you > update it... Yes; that's as it should be. If the user re-wrote their INI file and left out a parameter, or had a typo, it would permanantly corrupt the INI file. I figured that would be a bad idea, so I've *always* rebuilt the INI file. If you've had a version that behaved differently, that feature wasn't coded by me, either. -- David Cuny
3. Re: ee.ex
- Posted by Bernie Ryan <bwryan at PCOM.NET> Sep 10, 1999
- 395 views
Sorry David The problem is that CyrekSoft editor has the same name ee.ex and the same files included in it and I was comparing your ee.ex with his ee.ex and other files. It seems like each editor should have a unique name for its files unless they share a identical file. This would avoid the confusion. Sorry to waste your time Bernie
4. Re: ee.ex
- Posted by "Cuny, David" <David.Cuny at DSS.CA.GOV> Sep 10, 1999
- 416 views
Bernie Ryan wrote: > The problem is that CyrekSoft editor has the same > name ee.ex ... It's got some neat features, but I think you can understand why I don't want to be supporting someone else's code. -- David Cuny